J Cancer 2019; 10(2):504-509. doi:10.7150/jca.26583

Research Paper

Association of RAGE gene four single nucleotide polymorphisms with the risk, invasion, metastasis and overall survival of gastric cancer in Chinese

Dan Hu1,*, Qing Liu2,*, Xiandong Lin1, Hejun Zhang1, Jinxiu Lin2, Xiongwei Zheng1, Feng Peng2, Corresponding address

1. Department of Pathology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
2. Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
*Shared first authors.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
How to cite this article:
Hu D, Liu Q, Lin X, Zhang H, Lin J, Zheng X, Peng F. Association of RAGE gene four single nucleotide polymorphisms with the risk, invasion, metastasis and overall survival of gastric cancer in Chinese. J Cancer 2019; 10(2):504-509. doi:10.7150/jca.26583. Available from http://www.jcancer.org/v10p0504.htm

Abstract

Objectives: The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is an oncogenic trans-membranous receptor expressed in many cells. The aim of this study was to clarify the association between RAGE gene 4 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the risk, invasion, metastasis and overall survival of gastric cancer.

Methods and Results: We performed a hospital-based case-control study involving 369 gastric cancer patients and 493 cancer free controls. Four widely-studied SNPs, rs1800625 (T-429C), rs1800624 (T-374A), rs2070600 (Gly82Ser) and rs184003 (G1704T) in RAGE gene, were genotyped by the polymerase chain reaction - ligase detection reaction method. The RAGE gene rs1800625 TT genotype and T allele were significantly associated with a reduced risk of gastric cancer (TT vs. CC: adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.55-0.95, p=0.021; T vs. C: adjusted OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.46-0.97, p=0.032). No hints of significance were detected for the other three SNPs in association with gastric cancer risk. Moreover, rs1800625 and rs184003 were significantly associated with tumor clinical stage (p=0.010 and 0.032, respectively). Survival curves differed significantly between the genotypes of rs1800625.

Conclusions: RAGE gene SNP rs1800625 was significantly associated with gastric cancer risk, and rs1800625 and rs184003 were related to tumor clinical stage, indicating that RAGE gene may be a gastric cancer-susceptibility gene.

Keywords: Gastric cancer, RAGE, Single nucleotide polymorphism, Risk, Survival

Introduction

Gastric cancer is a major cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and it is the fifth most common malignancy [1-3]. Gastric cancer has a high incidence rate in East Asia, and in particular nearly 42% of global gastric cancer cases occur in China [4]. Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, the prognosis for patients with advanced gastric cancer remains dismal.[5] Gastric carcinogenesis is a complex, multistep and sequential process [6]. Like other malignancies, many factors may contribute to the development of gastric cancer, such as nutrition, dietary habits, salt consumption, excessive alcohol intake, tobacco smoking, Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori) infection, chronic gastritis, atrophyintestinal metaplasia and dysplasia [7-12]. Besides these factors, a large number of studies have demonstrated that the development of gastric cancer is partly under genetic control [13-15]. Recently, several promising genes have been identified as potential gastric cancer susceptibility genes. An important one is the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) gene.

RAGE is an oncogenic multidisciplinary trans-membranous receptor expressed in a number of cells. As a member of immunoglobulin superfamily of receptors, RAGE carries unique properties that make it a key component in the pathogenesis of many diseases and their impediments, such as inflammation, vascular diseases and different malignancies [16-18]. In addition, numerous clinical studies confirmed that the expression of RAGE was associated with prostate cancer [19], gastric cancer [20], gallbladder cancer [21], pancreatic cancer [22], lung cancer [23], colorectal cancer [24] and oral squamous cell carcinoma [25]. Besides, growing evidence suggests that some single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in RAGE gene were related to the angiogenesis and tumor metastasis [25], and blocking RAGE signal can inhibit the growth and metastasis of glioma cells [26]. Gu et al. reported that mutation of RAGE gene rs2070600 was associated with a significantly higher risk of gastric cancer [15]. Based on above observations, it is reasonable to hypothesize that RAGE gene is a promising candidate of gastric cancer. To test this hypothesis, we here genotyped four well-characterized SNPs in RAGE gene, rs1800625 (T-429C), rs1800624 (T-374A), rs2070600 (Gly82Ser) and rs184003 (G1704T), to see whether their genetic variation can alter the risk of gastric cancer and associate with its invasion, metastasis and overall survival.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital.

Patients and Samples

This study included 387 patients who had gastric cancer confirmed by histopathology at Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital between January 2008 and December 2010, and all patients received no chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Of the total 387 patients recruited in this study, 18 patients were lost to follow-up, 369 patients with gastric cancer were assessed in final analysis. Another 493 cases of the same period who took physical examinations at this hospital were selected by a random number table method as control group, and they were matched with patients on age (± 5 years old), sex and place of residence. All study subjects were Han Chinese who lived in Fujian Province for more than 10 years, and had no blood relationship with each other. Tumor histological grade was determined according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) system (2010) and the International Union against Cancer (UICC). Written informed consents were obtained from all patients and controls.

Biospecimen and DNA Extraction

The adjacent tissues of gastric cancer specimens from patients were embedded in paraffin using standard methods. Then, genomic DNA was extracted according to the Tiagen DNA kit instructions. Controls provided 5 ml venous EDTA anticoagulant blood according to Beijing BioTeke of the whole blood extraction DNA kit operating instructions. The amount of DNA was detected by UV spectrophotometer, and absorbance values (A values), A260 and A280 were measured with the ratio ranging from 1.8 to 2.0.

SNP Selection and Genotyping

Four SNPs in RAGE gene, rs1800625 C>T, rs1800624 T>A, rs2070600 G>A and rs184003 G>T, that were widely evaluated with association diabetes and cancer were selected for analysis. SNP genotype information was retrieved from the dbSNP database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.gov/projects/SNP/). Genotyping was performed using the polymerase chain reaction - ligase detection reaction (PCR-LDR) method. The DNA fragment containing the SNP loci was amplified by PCR using an ABI9600 PCR instrument (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The characteristics of sequences in this study are summarized in Table 1.

PCR reaction was carried out in a total reaction volume of 15 μl, containing DNA 1 μl, 1.5 μl 10×buffer, 1.5 μl MgCL2, 0.3 μl DNTP (Fermentas, United States), 0.15 μl of each primer, 0.3 μl Taq enzyme (Fermentas, United States) and 10.25 μl H2O. The steps were as follows: initial denaturation step at 94℃ for 3 min, amplification was carried out by 35 cycles at 94℃ for 15 s, 54℃ for 15 s, and at 72℃ for 30 s, followed by a final elongation cycle at 72℃ for 3 min. The connection reaction was performed at adding the PCR product 3 μl, 1 U 10×Taq DNA ligase buffer (New England Biolabs, United States), 0.125 μl Taq DNA ligase (40 U/μl, New England Biolabs, United States ), probe (10p) 0.01 μl/strip and with H2O added to 10 μl under the condition of by cycles at 94℃ for 30 s, 56℃ for 3 min. LDR fluorescent products were analyzed by ABI 377 sequence analyzer (Perkin-Elmer, Foster City, CA, USA), and the results were analyzed by the fragment analysis software GeneMapper 3.7 (Applied Biosystems, Foster city, CA, USA).

To test the accuracy of PCR-LDR method, a total of 96 DNA samples were randomly selected from the total sample, and they were genotyped using the same method, with exactly the sample findings for duplicated samples.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software version 19.0 (SPSS Inc). Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance was tested by a chi-square (χ2) or the Fisher's exact test. Satisfaction of all genotypes with the Hardy-Weinberg proportions was calculated in control groups. Linkage disequilibrium was depicted using the Haploview software version 4.2. The genotypes of four examined SNPs in RAGE gene were explored by unconditional logistic regression analyses to obtain odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). Survival curves were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. A two-sided p-value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Clinical Characteristics

The final analysis included 369 cases and 493 controls who were frequency matched as previously described. About 70.7% of gastric cancer patients were male, and patients aged 60 years or over accounted for 48.5%. 69.0% of controls were male, and controls aged 60 years or over accounted for 48.1% (Table 2). There were no significant differences in age and sex between patients and controls (p>0.05). The genotype distributions of four SNPs in controls were checked by the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test (Table 1), and no deviations were noticed (all p>0.05).

Association between RAGE Gene SNPs and Gastric Cancer Risk

The linkage disequilibrium of four studied SNPs is presented in Supplementary Figure 1. In logistic regression analyses, RAGE gene rs1800625 TT genotype was associated with a significantly reduced risk of gastric cancer (OR: 0.72; 95% CI 0.55-0.95; p=0.021) after adjusting for age and sex, and the power to reject the null hypothesis that this OR equals 1 was 66.1% (Table 3). Additionally, the T allele also reduces the risk of gastric cancer (OR: 0.67; 95% CI 0.46-0.97; p=0.032), with study power of 82.4%. In contrast, there were no significant differences in the genotype and allele distributions of the other three polymorphisms between the cases and controls with the increase risk for the development of gastric cancer (all p>0.05).

Association between RAGE Gene SNPs and Clinical Features

Considering the association between SNPs and clinical features of patients with gastric cancer, we analyzed whether the variation of SNPs were linked to TNM stage and lymph node metastasis. In our study we found that the polymorphisms of RAGE gene rs1800625 and rs184003 were associated with tumor clinical stage (p=0.010, p=0.032, respectively) (Table 4). However, no evidence demonstrated that the SNPs of RAGE gene was related to Lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer (all p>0.05). As shown in Table 4.

 Table 1 

Primer sequences of RAGE gene four SNPs and the test of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium

SNPsUpstream sequenceDownstream sequenceCase group*Control group*
rs18006255'-AAACATGAGAAACCCCAGAA-3'5'-TGTACCCTCTAGGGTCTCATTC-3'0.699a0.277b
rs18006245'-AAACATGAGAAACCCCAGAA-3'5'-TGTACCCTCTAGGGTCTCATTC-3'0.0750.061
rs20706005'-CGTCACTCTGCCTCACAGTC-3'5'-GTCTCCTTTCCATTCCTGTTC-3'0.2510.729
rs1840035'-AATTGGTGGTGGAGCCAGAAG-3'5'-TTCAGATACCCTCTCTTCCTC-3'0.4400.799

*The p values of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test.

 Table 2 

Demographic characteristics of the study subjects

CharacteristicsTotal subjects (n=862)Case group (n=369)Control group (n=493)
Age (years)
≥ 60416179 (48.5%)237 (48.1%)
< 60446190 (51.5%)256 (51.9%)
Sex
Male601261 (70.7%)340 (69.0%)
Female261108 (29.3%)153 (31.0%)
TNM stage
I46
II72
III210
IV41
Lymph node metastasis
N088
N186
N281
N3114
 Table 3 

Genotype distributions and allele frequencies of RAGE gene four SNPs between cases and controls

SNPsControls (n=493)Cases (n=369)OR (95% CI)ap
rs1800625
CC6 (1.2%)1 (0.3%)1.00ref
CT77 (15.6%)44 (11.9%)0.21 (0.03-1.76)0.150
TT410 (83.2%)324 (87.8%)0.72 (0.55-0.95)0.021
C allele89 (9%)46 (6.2%)1.00ref
T allele897 (91%)692 (93.8%)0.67 (0.46-0.97)0.032
TT+CT vs. CC4.53 (0.54-37.82)0.249
rs1800624
TT378 (76.7%)274 (74.3%)1.00ref
AT102 (20.7%)83 (22.5%)0.79 (0.49-1.27)0.323
AA13 (2.6%)12 (3.3%)0.88 (0.54-1.45)0.619
T allele858 (87%)631 (85.5%)1.00ref
A allele128 (13%)107 (14.5%)1.14 (0.86-1.50)0.360
AA+AT vs. TT1.14 (0.83-1.56)0.236
rs2070600
GG325 (65.9%)221 (59.9%)1.00ref
GA152 (30.8%)134 (36.3%)0.78 (0.50-1.22)0.270
AA16 (3.2%)14 (3.8%)1.01 (0.65-1.57)0.974
G allele802 (81.3%)576 (78%)1.00ref
A allele184 (18.7%)162 (22%)1.22 (0.97-1.55)0.092
AA+AG vs. GG1.30 (0.98-1.71)0.074
rs184003
GG318 (64.5%)240 (65%)1.00ref
GT157 (31.8%)118 (32%)1.24 (0.78-1.97)0.373
TT18 (3.7%)11 (3%)1.23 (0.77-1.96)0.383
G allele793 (80.4%)598 (81%)1.00ref
T allele193 (19.6%)140 (19%)1.04 (0.81-1.32)0.75
TT+GT vs. GG0.98 (0.74-1.30)0.886

Abbreviations: OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.

aThe p was calculated after adjusting for age and sex under logistic regression model.

Association between RAGE Gene SNPs and Gastric Cancer Survival

In this study, we further analyzed whether the genotypes of studied SNPs had an association with gastric cancer survival. The Kaplan-Meier curves of survival in gastric cancer patients were shown in Figure 1. There was no significant difference in gender, age, height and weight between gastric cancer survivors and death patients (p>0.05). A difference in survival curves was noted between rs1800625 genotypes. Patients who carried the T gene of rs1800625 had significantly longer survival time (p<0.05, Figure 1A). However, no significantly association between the other three SNPs and gastric cancer survival time was observed.

Discussion

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that RAGE gene was a promising candidate of gastric cancer. Our findings indicated that in RAGE gene, rs1800625 was associated with gastric cancer risk, and rs1800625 and rs184003 were related to tumor clinical stage, indicating that RAGE gene may be a gastric cancer-susceptibility gene.

It is well known that accumulating genetic variation plays crucial function roles within the tumorigenesis of gastric cancer [27]. In order to clarify potential biomarkers of gastric carcinogenesis, we selected four SNPs of RAGE gene and investigated their associations with the risk, metastasis and survival of gastric cancer in a population of Fujian, and our findings proposed that potentially functional SNPs of RAGE gene may play a role in the etiology of gastric cancer.

RAGE activates central cell pathways including mitogen-activated protein kinase, Cdc42 / Rac and nuclear factor-nB signaling by binding to ligands [17,28,29]. Previous studies demonstrated that the association between RAGE genetic polymorphisms and gastric cancer risk [15]. In this study, we found that RAGE gene rs1800625 TT genotype and T allele were significantly associated with a reduced risk of gastric cancer. In addition, accumulating evidence shows that the expression of RAGE gene may be strongly related to the invasive and metastatic activity of gastric cancer [19,20]. Our findings indicated that two SNPs in RAGE gene, rs1800625 and rs184003, were associated with tumor clinical stage. Besides, the patients who carried the T gene of rs1800625 had significantly longer survival time.

 Table 4 

Association between RAGE gene four SNPs and clinical characteristics of gastric cancer

Clinical characteristicsrs1800625rs1800624
CCCTTTpCT+TTpTTATAApAT+AAp
Lymph node metastasis
N009790.532880.303691630.562190.329
N1-N313223126319264872
TNM stage
I-II015920.011070.002842210.364230.233
III-IV126215241175571067
rs2070600rs184003
GGGAAApGA+AApGGGTTTpGT+TTp
Lymph node metastasis
N0543040.984340.95562840.73320.86
N1-N315897910617384791
TNM stage
I-II633770.793440.908703430.032370.427
III-IV1478969515976783

Abbreviations: TNM, tumor node metastasis.

 Figure 1 

Tumor site-specific Kaplan-Meier survival curves according the genotypes of RAGE gene four SNPs in gastric cancer patients

J Cancer Image (Click on the image to enlarge.)

Gu et al. found that this SNP was associated with the increased risk of gastric cancer among subgroups of younger subjects aged ≤ 58 years [15]. On the other hand, Li et al. reported that the rs2070600 AG genotype was significantly associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer among nonsmokers, nondrinkers and gastric cancer patients [1]. However, our results did not show similar results, and may need a large sample size and more detailed risk factor information to validate.

Several limitations for this study should be acknowledged. First, we only genotyped four well-defined SNPs in RAGE gene, and other SNPs were of additional interest in association with the risk and prognosis of gastric cancer. Second, the sample size involved was not large enough to derive a reliable estimate, and so our findings needed to be confirmed in large, well-designed studies. Third, only Chinese subjects were enrolled for analysis, and the extrapolation of our findings to the other ethnic groups was limited.

Taken together, our findings indicated that RAGE gene rs1800625 was associated with gastric cancer risk, and rs1800625 and rs184003 were related to tumor clinical stage, indicating that RAGE gene may be a gastric cancer-susceptibility gene.

Supplementary Material

Attachment

Supplementary figure.

Acknowledgements

Funding

This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (Grant nos. 2016J01508), Joint Funds for the innovation of science and Technology, Fujian province (Grant number: 2017Y9090) and the Ministry of Health P.R. China (Grant no. WKJ2016-2-05).

Author Contributions

FP, XZ planned and designed the study, and directed its implementation; DH, FP, JL drafted the protocol; QL, XL, HZ obtained statutory and ethics approvals; DH, XL, HZ contributed to data acquisition; FP, DH, XZ had access to all raw data; DH, QL, FP did the data preparation, quality control and data analysis; FP, DH wrote the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

References

1. Li T, Qin W, Liu Y, Li S, Qin X, Liu Z. Effect of RAGE gene polymorphisms and circulating sRAGE levels on susceptibility to gastric cancer: a case-control study. Cancer Cell Int. 2017;17:19

2. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M. et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:E359-86

3. Fidler MM, Gupta S, Soerjomataram I, Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality among young adults aged 20-39 years worldwide in 2012: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:1579-89

4. Parkin DM. International variation. Oncogene. 2004;23:6329-40

5. Yue Z, Song Y, Wang Z, Luo Y, Jiang L, Xing L. et al. Association of heparanase gene (HPSE-1) single nucleotide polymorphisms with gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102:68-72

6. Correa P. Human gastric carcinogenesis: a multistep and multifactorial process-First American Cancer Society Award Lecture on Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. Cancer Res. 1992;52:6735-40

7. Yuzhalin A. The role of interleukin DNA polymorphisms in gastric cancer. Hum Immunol. 2011;72:1128-36

8. Liu C, Russell RM. Nutrition and gastric cancer risk: an update. Nutr Rev. 2008;66:237-49

9. Tredaniel J, Boffetta P, Buiatti E, Saracci R, Hirsch A. Tobacco smoking and gastric cancer: review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 1997;72:565-73

10. Xu Z, Zhu H, Luk JM, Wu D, Gu D, Gong W. et al. Clinical significance of SOD2 and GSTP1 gene polymorphisms in Chinese patients with gastric cancer. Cancer. 2012;118:5489-96

11. Correa P, Haenszel W, Cuello C, Zavala D, Fontham E, Zarama G. et al. Gastric precancerous process in a high risk population: cross-sectional studies. Cancer Res. 1990;50:4731-6

12. Larsson SC, Bergkvist L, Wolk A. Processed meat consumption, dietary nitrosamines and stomach cancer risk in a cohort of Swedish women. Int J Cancer. 2006;119:915-9

13. Zhu H, Yang L, Zhou B, Yu R, Tang N, Wang B. Myeloperoxidase G-463A polymorphism and the risk of gastric cancer: a case-control study. Carcinogenesis. 2006;27:2491-6

14. Gu H, Yang L, Tang N, Zhou B, Zhu H, Sun Q. et al. Association of endothelin-converting enzyme-1b C-338A polymorphism with gastric cancer risk: a case-control study. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44:1253-8

15. Gu H, Yang L, Sun Q, Zhou B, Tang N, Cong R. et al. Gly82Ser polymorphism of the receptor for advanced glycation end products is associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer in a Chinese population. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:3627-32

16. Schmidt AM, Yan SD, Yan SF, Stern DM. The multiligand receptor RAGE as a progression factor amplifying immune and inflammatory responses. J Clin Invest. 2001;108:949-55

17. Taguchi A, Blood DC, del Toro G, Canet A, Lee DC, Qu W. et al. Blockade of RAGE-amphoterin signalling suppresses tumour growth and metastases. Nature. 2000;405:354-60

18. Xia W, Xu Y, Mao Q, Dong G, Shi R, Wang J. et al. Association of RAGE polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 27 studies. Med Oncol. 2015;32:442

19. Ishiguro H, Nakaigawa N, Miyoshi Y, Fujinami K, Kubota Y, Uemura H. Receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) and its ligand, amphoterin are overexpressed and associated with prostate cancer development. Prostate. 2005;64:92-100

20. Kuniyasu H, Oue N, Wakikawa A, Shigeishi H, Matsutani N, Kuraoka K. et al. Expression of receptors for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) is closely associated with the invasive and metastatic activity of gastric cancer. J Pathol. 2002;196:163-70

21. Hirata K, Takada M, Suzuki Y, Kuroda Y. Expression of receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) in human biliary cancer cells. Hepatogastroenterology. 2003;50:1205-7

22. Takada M, Hirata K, Ajiki T, Suzuki Y, Kuroda Y. Expression of receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) and MMP-9 in human pancreatic cancer cells. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004;51:928-30

23. Schraml P, Bendik I, Ludwig CU. Differential messenger RNA and protein expression of the receptor for advanced glycosylated end products in normal lung and non-small cell lung carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1997;57:3669-71

24. Jiao L, Taylor PR, Weinstein SJ, Graubard BI, Virtamo J, Albanes D. et al. Advanced glycation end products, soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products, and risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:1430-8

25. Xu XC, Abuduhadeer X, Zhang WB, Li T, Gao H, Wang YH. Knockdown of RAGE inhibits growth and invasion of gastric cancer cells. Eur J Histochem. 2013;57:e36

26. Tanaka N, Yonekura H, Yamagishi S, Fujimori H, Yamamoto Y, Yamamoto H. The receptor for advanced glycation end products is induced by the glycation products themselves and tumor necrosis factor-alpha through nuclear factor-kappa B, and by 17beta-estradiol through Sp-1 in human vascular endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:25781-90

27. Deng N, Goh LK, Wang H, Das K, Tao J, Tan IB. et al. A comprehensive survey of genomic alterations in gastric cancer reveals systematic patterns of molecular exclusivity and co-occurrence among distinct therapeutic targets. Gut. 2012;61:673-84

28. Hermani A, Hess J, De Servi B, Medunjanin S, Grobholz R, Trojan L. et al. Calcium-binding proteins S100A8 and S100A9 as novel diagnostic markers in human prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:5146-52

29. Sasahira T, Kirita T, Bhawal UK, Yamamoto K, Ohmori H, Fujii K. et al. Receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is important in the prediction of recurrence in human oral squamous cell carcinoma. Histopathology. 2007;51:166-72

Author contact

Corresponding address Corresponding author: Feng Peng, M.D., Address: Chazhong Road 20, Taijiang District, Fuzhou 350005, Fujian, China. Phone: +86-591-8798 1637; Fax: +86-591-8798 1635; E-mail: pengfengedu.cn or fengpengfuzhounet.


Received 2018-4-9
Accepted 2018-12-8
Published 2019-1-1