J Cancer 2013; 4(6):458-463. doi:10.7150/jca.6755 This issue

Research Paper

A Comparison of Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Parathyroidectomy and Traditional Parathyroidectomy for Parathyroid Adenoma

Paolo Del Rio1, Diego Vicente2✉, Umberto Maestroni1, Anna Totaro1, Gian Maria Casoni Pattacini1, Itzhak Avital3, Alexander Stojadinovic2,4,5, Mario Sianesi1

1. Department of Surgery -University Hospital of Parma;
2. Department of Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA;
3. Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA, USA;
4. United States Military Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA;
5. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) License. See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
Rio PD, Vicente D, Maestroni U, Totaro A, Pattacini GMC, Avital I, Stojadinovic A, Sianesi M. A Comparison of Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Parathyroidectomy and Traditional Parathyroidectomy for Parathyroid Adenoma. J Cancer 2013; 4(6):458-463. doi:10.7150/jca.6755. Available from https://www.jcancer.org/v04p0458.htm

File import instruction


Background: Pre-operative imaging techniques for sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism (SPHPT) and intraoperative parathyroid hormone (ioPTH) have led to the wide spread use of minimally invasive surgical approaches.

Study Design: In our prospectively collected database, 157 subjects with SPHPT and a preoperative diagnosis of parathyroid adenoma were treated with parathyroidectomy between January 2003 and November 2011. Subjects in group A were enrolled between January 2003 to September 2006, and underwent traditional parathyroidectomy with intraoperative frozen section and bilateral neck exploration. Subjects in group B were enrolled between September 2006 to November 2011, and underwent minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy (MIVAP) with ioPTH. Operative times and post-operative pain levels were compared between groups. Subjects were followed for a minimum of 6 months post-operatively and recurrence rates and complication rates were measured between groups.

Results: 81 subjects were enrolled in group A, and 76 subjects were enrolled in group B. Pre-operative evaluation demonstrated that the groups were statistically similar. Significantly decreased operative times (28min vs. 62min) and post-operative pain levels were noted in group B. Recurrence rates were similar between group A (3.7%) and group B (2.6%).

Conclusions: MIVAP with ioPTH demonstrated significantly improved operative times and post-operative pain levels, while maintaining equivalent recurrence rates.

Keywords: Parathyroidectomy, minimally invasive surgical approach