PDF

J Cancer 2021; 12(6):1742-1754. doi:10.7150/jca.51321 This issue Cite

Research Paper

AURKA and FAM83A are prognostic biomarkers and correlated with Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes in smoking related Lung Adenocarcinoma

Mengyu Zhang¹, Chen Huo¹, Yingxiao Jiang¹, Jianyu Liu¹, Yican Yang¹, Yunhong Yin², Yiqing Qu²

1. Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
2. Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.

✉ Corresponding author: Prof. Yiqing Qu, MD, PhD, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Wenhuaxi Road 107#, Jinan 250012, China. Tel: +86 531 8216 9335; Fax: +86 531 8296 7544; E-mail: quyiqingedu.cn. More

Abstract

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) has become the main histologic type, which account for nearly 40% of lung cancer. The present study aimed to investigate the gene expression signature in smoking related LUAD. A total of 45 smoking related DEGs in LUAD were identified and functional enrichment analysis was also performed. Then Cox's regression model and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to screen potential prognostic genes. Finally, AURKA and FAM83A were left for further immune-related mechanism exploration. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated survival rates are related to different immune cell (B cell and Dendritic cell) infiltration levels. Mechanistically, we further explore the correlation between AURKA and FAM83A gene expression levels and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) level as well as their response to immunomodulators. The results suggested that AURKA and FAM83A are highly expressed in smoking related LUAD, and negatively correlated to B cell and Dendritic cell infiltration levels. At the same time, B cell and Dendritic cell infiltration levels also related to the prognosis of LUAD. We further revealed AURKA and FAM83A could be novel targets to improve the prognosis of LUAD through regulated the response to immunomodulators.

Keywords: lung adenocarcinoma, smoking, prognosis, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes

Introduction

Lung cancer is still the most common leading cause of cancer death worldwide [1]. This differs from other cancers, less than 50% of lung cancer patients only could survive one year after diagnosed and the 5-year survival rate is only 18% at present [2,3]. Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) has become the main histologic type, which account for nearly 40% of lung cancer [3,4]. It is known that cigarette smoke is the most important risk factor, which leads to the majority of lung cancers. LUAD usually happened in the distal airway and frequently observed in smokers [5], while patients those abstain from smoking have a better prognosis than those continuing smokers after diagnosis [6].

Cigarette smoke consists of various chemicals which could cause badly damage to the respiratory epithelium as well as its genome exchange [7]. It is already studied that smoking history could result in higher frequencies of genomic alteration in lung cancer [8,9]. Besides, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has been demonstrated to be prognostic biomarkers in NSCLC [10,11]. However, the role of TILs as potential prognostic biomarkers remains controversial because elevated levels of TIL has been associated with both better and worse prognosis in NSCLC patients [12-15]. Previous studies demonstrated that the prognostic value of TILs significantly different according to histological type and smoking habit in NSCLC patients [16], which suggests that TILs may play key roles in lung cancer.

However, the exact relationships between gene expression signature and TILs levels in LUAD have not been well elucidated according to the status of smoking. Therefore, it is vital to elucidate the gene expression changes and TILs levels in the diagnosis and prognosis of LUAD according to the smoking history. In this study, we identified smoking related gene expression signature and explored their correlation with TILs in LUAD.

Materials and Methods

Data collection and identification of DEGs

Two smoking related LUAD gene expression profiles (GSE31210 and GSE43458) were retrieved from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). In brief, GSE31210 included 111 smoking related LUAD tissues and 115 non-smokers. GSE43458 included a total of 80 LUAD tissues which were comprised of comprised of 40 smokers and 40 non-smokers. The selected criteria were the followings: gene expression profiles; studies compared genes expression between smoker and non-smoker LUAD tissues in human. The excluded criteria were the followings: those studies that compared genes between lung cancer and adjacent non-tumorous lung tissues or normal tissues or benign disease in human; expression profiles using cell lines or serum, saliva, peripheral blood; studies did not include status of smoking; patient had no survival time or survival status; patient had clinical information but no gene expression data. GEO2R (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/geo2r/) are used to screen DEGs by comparing LUAD tissues between smoker and non-smoker groups. The criterion of DEGs were defined as P < 0.01 and the absolute fold change > 1.5. Besides, several R packages were also used to visualized the data. The ggplot2 package (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggplot2) in R software was used to perform the volcano plots in 2 smoking related LUAD GEO datasets; Venn Diagram package (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/VennDiagram/) was applied to identify the overlapped DEGs in 2 smoking related LUAD GEO datasets. Pheatmap package (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pheatmap) was used to performed heat maps for overlapped 45 DEGs.

Functional enrichment analysis

Functional enrichment comprised of KEGG pathway and GO enrichment analysis. In concise, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis could provide several signaling pathways associated with given genes, GO enrichment analysis could predict the biological functions of the target genes. In our study, GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis were performed by R software according to the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) results. In this category, P<0.05 was the cutoff value to identify significant GO terms and KEGG pathways.

TCGA datasets and identification of prognosis-related genes

The gene expression profiles and clinical data of LUAD patients were downloaded from the TCGA data portal (https://tcgadata.nci.nih.gov/tcga/). Finally, a total of 500 smoking related LUAD tissues, including 159 non-smokers and 341 smokers were used to further prognostic-related analysis. Detailed criteria for the inclusion and exclusion of patients have been presented in the “Data collection and identification of DEGs” part.

Cox's regression model, also named as proportional hazards model, uses survival outcomes and survival time as dependent variables. This model not only could analyze the impact of many factors on survival at the same time, also can analyze data with censored survival time and does not require estimation of the survival distribution type of the data.

In this study, Cox's regression model was used to assess the prognostic value of 45 DEGs. Firstly, univariable Cox regression analysis was performed using the survival package in R software and 12 DEGs were identified for next analysis (P<0.05). Then, 12 DEGs were further analyzed by stepwise multivariate Cox regression analysis. During the analysis procedure, Akaike information criterions (AICs) was used to select the lowest AIC value as a predicative model as well as the best performance efficacy predictive model. Finally, a total of four genes (AURKA, FAM83A, HSD17B2 and POU2AF1) were identified as prognostic genes.

Validation of prognostic genes

Prognostic genes were validated using public database Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn) and Kaplan Meier-plotter (https://kmplot.com/analysis/). GEPIA database contain expression data of various tumor samples as well as normal samples, including LUAD. Kaplan Meier-plotter is an online tool to perform survival curves, in which contain clinical data such as survival time and smoking history of various tumors. These two databases were used to verify the prognostic value of the DEGs.

GSEA analysis

GSEA analysis was used to further understand AURKA-related as well as FAM83A-related pathways. AURKA and FAM83A expression levels were used to grouping the LUAD patients in an independent TCGA cohort, samples with the expression levels were higher than the median value of both AURKA and FAM83A expression were assigned to the high expression group, rest of the samples are defined as low expression group automatically. The collection of annotated gene sets of c2.cp.kegg.v6.2.symbols.gmt was used to the reference gene sets and GSEA software was used to preform GSEA analysis. The cut-off criterion is FDR< 0.01.

Explore the immune-related mechanism of AURKA and FAM83A

Immune-related mechanism of AURKA and FAM83A were performed by TISDIB (http://cis.hku.hk/TISIDB/) and Tumor IMmune Estimation Resource TIMER (https://cistrome.shinyapps.io/timer/). In brief, TISIDB is an integrated repository portal for tumor-immune system interactions. It is also a powerful website containing a large amount of tumor immunity-related data, which is conducive to comprehensive research on the interaction between tumor and immunity. TIMER web server is a comprehensive resource for systematical analysis of immune infiltrates across diverse cancer types. The abundances of six immune infiltrates (B cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, Neutrophils, Macrophages, and Dendritic cells) are estimated by TIMER algorithm. TIMER web server allows users to input function-specific parameters, with resulting figures dynamically displayed to conveniently access the tumor immunological, clinical, and genomic features.

In this study, we performed TISIDB-Reactome pathway analysis of AURKA and FAM83A. Besides, we also validate AURKA and FAM83A expression levels and their relation to OS in both TISDIB and TIMER database. We further explored cumulative survival rates between low and high immune cell (B Cell and Dendritic Cell) infiltration levels in TIMER. Then correlation between AURKA as well as FAM83A expression level and immune cell infiltration level were explored, so as the correlation between SCNA levels of two genes and immune cell infiltration level. Finally, gene expression levels and SCNA levels of two genes and their relationships to immunoinhibitors also examined. Purity-corrected partial Spearman method was used to analyze the data.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performing using SPSS IBM for windows version 23.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) and Graph Pad Prism 7.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). We divided patients into the high and low expression of AURKA and FAM83A groups with the median of gene expression levels. Single comparison of the expression rates between two groups were determined by Student's t-test. Kaplan Meier survival curves were performed by TCGA cohort and examined by Log-rank test. The correlation between gene expression levels and infiltrating immune cell levels are used purity-corrected partial Spearman method. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and functional enrichment in smoking related LUAD

In this study, two smoking related LUAD gene expression profiles were extracted from GEO database to explore gene expression signature, including GSE31210 and GSE43458. GSE31210 including 111 smokers and 115 non-smokers, GSE43458 including 40 smokers and 40 non-smokers. Genes with P<0.01 and absolute fold change>1.5 were defined as DEGs. After screening process, there are 323 genes differentially expressed in GSE31210 (Figure 1A) and 657 DEGs in GSE43458 (Figure 1B). After overlapping DEGs between GSE31210 and GSE43458, 45 DEGs were identified in smoking related LUAD patients (Figure 2A). For further visualization, we also performed heatmaps of 45 DEGs in both GSE31210 and GSE43458 (Figure 1C and 1D). Finally, 45 DEGs were screened in smoking related LUAD patients. To explore the biological functions of the 45 DEGs, gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis were performed. The GO analysis results showed these 45 DEGs were mainly involved in chondrocyte development, basal plasma membrane and receptor agonist activity in biological process, cellular component and molecular function, respectively (Figure 2C-2E). Besides, KEGG pathway analysis demonstrated that most of these target genes were enriched in PI3K/Akt signaling pathway (Figure 2B). All the results suggest that changes in immune and metabolic-related are pathways are also necessary for tumorigenesis and development.

Prognostic gene expression signature was identified in smoking related LUAD

According to the functional enrichment analysis results, 45 DEGs were considered to have a significant connection with tumorigenesis and development, so we further explored the prognostic value of 45 DEGs in smoking related LUAD. Univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to identify the significant prognostic genes, then all the significant prognostic genes were used to perform multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. The univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that there are 12 genes have prognostic values (Table 1). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis of the 12 genes revealed that AURKA, FAM83A, HSD17B2 and POU2AF1 have prognostic values (Figure 3A, Table 2). The results showed that the hazard ratio (HR) of AURKA was 1.156 with 95% confidence interval (CI) is 1.004-1.331 (P=0.043), the HR of FAM83A was 1.107 with 95% CI is 1.019-1.202 (P=0.016), the HR of HSD17B2 was 1.091 with 95% CI is 1.032-1.154 (P=0.002) and the HR of POU2AF1 was 0.904 with 95% CI is 0.830-0.985 (P=0.002), which means that AURKA, FAM83A and HSD17B2 are risk factors, whereas POU2AF1 is a protective factor. Besides, we also performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to estimate the diagnostic value of 4 genes using an independent LUAD cohort from TCGA database, in which including 341 smokers and 159 non-smokers. Unfortunately, the results showed that the area under curve (AUC) of all the groups seems have no significant difference in all LUAD patients (Figure 3B, Table S1). Besides, the same results also showed at early stage LUAD patients (Stage I) (Figure 3C, Table S2), in which including 186 smokers and 87 non-smokers.

 Figure 1 

Screening differentially expressed gene signature. (A-B) Volcano plots of the gene expression signature analysis in GSE31210 and GSE43458. (C-D) Heatmaps of 45 DEGs expression levels in GSE31210 and GSE43458.

 Figure 2 

Functional enrichment analysis of 45 DEGs in smoking related LUAD. (A) A total of 45 genes were overlapped in two smoking related LUAD GEO datasets (GSE31210 and GSE43458). (B) UpSet view of enriched KEGG pathways in LUAD. X-axis: gene number of pathway types. Y-axis: the number of genes for one or several pathway types. (C) The circle plots showed the gene ontology terms and their correlation among top 24 genes. (D) The significantly enriched gene ontology terms. (E) The outer circle indicated the expression of DEGs. The inner circle indicated the significantly enriched GO terms.

 Figure 3 

(A) Forest plot of multivariate cox regression analysis. (B) ROC analysis of four DEGs and the combination diagnostic value of LUAD patients. (C) ROC analysis of four DEGs and the combination diagnostic value of early stage LUAD patients (Stage I).

 Figure 4 

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis by different gene expression levels of AURKA, FAM83A, HSD17B2 and POU2AF1 in 341 smoking related LUAD patients from an independent TCGA cohort. (A) OS between low and high AURKA expression. (B) OS between low and high FAM83A expression. (C) OS between low and high HSD17B2 expression. (D) OS between low and high POU2AF1 expression. (E) OS among three different groups.

Association of AURKA, FAM83A, HSD17B2 and POU2AF1 expression levels with overall survival (OS) of smoking related LUAD

Previous results demonstrated that AURKA, FAM83A, HSD17B2 and POU2AF1 may have prognostic values in smoking related LUAD. To further explore whether these four genes will affect the clinical outcomes, we performed Kaplan-Meier analysis using TCGA cohort. As shown in Figure 4A-D, AURKA expression was significantly associated with OS (P<0.001) among the smoking related LUAD. The median OS in AURKA low expression group was 58.80 months whereas in high expression group was 21.41 months. Similarly, higher expression of FAM83A is associated with a shorter OS (P=0.007), the median OS was 59.07 months in low expression group and 41.56 months in high expression group. As for POU2AF1, its low expression was remarkably related to longer OS (P=0.001). The median OS in low expression group was 58.41 months, while in high expression group was 41.56 months. While speaking about HSD17B2, its expression level seems have no significance with OS statistically (P=0.149).

Based on previous OS analysis results, there are three significant prognostic genes, further to assess the integrated effects of these three genes on the prognosis, we divided all these smoking related LUAD patients into three groups according to the number of positive biomarkers. Positive biomarkers defined as high expression of AURKA and FAM83A as well as the low expression of POU2AF1. Group 1 have any one positive biomarker of three genes, group 2 have any two positive biomarkers of three genes and group 3 have all these three biomarkers. The results revealed that positive biomarker numbers indeed associated with OS (P=0.034), which means that united of 3 genes maybe forecast the OS of smoking related LUAD (Figure 4E). In conclusion, high expression of AURKA and FAM83A as well as the low expression of POU2AF1 can be used as potential prognostic biomarkers in smoking related LUAD patients.

Validation of AURKA, FAM83A and POU2AF1 expression levels and their relation with OS in LUAD

AURKA, FAM83A and POU2AF1 were identified as prognostic genes in TCGA database, we also validated their expression levels in online tool GEPIA. Consistent with previous results, AURKA, FAM83A and POU2AF1 were highly expressed in LUAD patients compared with normal controls (Figure S1A-C). Besides, we also explored their expression levels among different stages of LUAD patients and the results suggested that their expression level were also related to stage (Figure S1D-F). Furthermore, we also performed Kaplan-Meier analysis using Kaplan Meier-plotter online tool to validate the prognostic value of AURKA, FAM83A and POU2AF1. However, different with our previous results, POU2AF1 expression level seems have no effects on OS in smoking related LUAD (Figure 5D-6F). Considering smoking history of LUAD patients, we explored the relationship between AURKA, FAM83A, POU2AF1 expression levels and person cigarette smoking history (pack year). Different with our expectation, it seems that there is no relation between AURKA, FAM83A, POU2AF1 expression levels and person cigarette smoking history (pack year) statistically (P=0.150, P=0.592A and P=0.724, respectively) (Figure 5A-6C). Finally, we analyzed the pathway of high-expression of AURKA and FAM83A by GSEA analysis. The results showed that high AURKA and FAM83A expression samples were mainly enriched in RNA degradation, P53 signaling pathway, focal adhesion and cell cycle (Figure 6).

Associations of AURKA and FAM83A expression levels with clinicopathological variables

Clinicopathological characteristics of the smoking related lung adenocarcinoma patients are listed in Table 3. As Table 3 showed, AURKA expression was remarkably positively associated with gender (P<0.001), smoking history (P=0.016), pathological T stage (P=0.029) and pathological N stage (P=0.032). No significant difference of AURKA mRNA levels was found in patients with age (P=0.277) and pathological M stage (P=0.437); the elevated FAM83A expression was closely related with gender (P=0.019), smoking history (P=0.001), pathological T stage (P=0.010) and pathological N stage (P=0.004).

AURKA and FAM83A expression levels and associations between TILs and OS

The KEGG pathway and Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) enrichment analysis results showed that AURKA and FAM83A are hub genes of cancer-related pathways. TISIDB-Reactome pathway analysis shows the similar results that AURKA and FAM83A are involved in the cell cycle in the immune system (Table 4). Firstly, we validate AURKA and FAM83A expression levels (Figure 7A-B) as well as their expression levels in different stages (Figure 7D-E) and their relation to OS in both TISIDB and TIMER databases (Figure 7F-I). Furthermore, correlation between AURKA and FAM83A expression levels were also explored. The results showed that as tumor purity increasing, AURKA and FAM83A expression levels are positive related (r=0.333, P=2.99e-14) (Figure 7C). Finally, we constructed Kaplan-Meier analysis between high and low TILs expression levels. Kaplan-Meier analysis results showed that cumulative survival rates between low and high immune cell (B cell and Dendritic cell) infiltration levels are different (P<0.001 and P=0.048) (Figure 7J).

 Figure 5 

(A-C) The relationship between AURKA, FAM83A, POU2AF1 expression levels and person cigarette smoking history (pack year). (D-F) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of AURKA, FAM83A, POU2AF1 in smoking-related LUAD according to Kaplan Meier-plotter.

For further exploration, we conducted an integrated analysis to predict the potential biological roles of AURKA and FAM83A in tumor-immune of LUAD. The results showed that AURKA and FAM83A expression levels are negatively correlated to B cell (r=-0.207, P=4.58e-06; r=-0.276, P=6.55e-10) as well as Dendritic cell (r=-0.115, P=1.09e-02; r=-0.107, P=1.82e-02) infiltration levels in TIMER database (Figure 8A-B). Heatmap analysis between AURAK and FAM83A expression levels and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in TISDIB database were also performed (Figure 8C-D). According to the heatmap analysis results, we found that B cell and Dendritic cell infiltration levels were negatively related to AURKA and FAM83A expression levels, so we also validated the correlation between AURKA and FAM83A expression levels and immune cell infiltration levels in TISDIB database. The results showed that AURKA and FAM83A expression levels are both negatively related to B cell infiltration level (r=-0.239, P=4.34e-08; r=-0.143, P=0.001), which consistent with previous results. As to dendritic cell infiltration level, it only positively related to FAM83A expression level (r=0.137, P=0.002), not AURKA expression level (r=-0.049, P=0.269), which differ from previous results.

Associations between somatic copy number variation (SCNA) levels of AURKA and FAM83A and TILs levels

The ''SCNA'' module provides the comparison of the abundance of TILs among tumors with different somatic copy number aberrations for a given gene, we further explored the association between SCNA levels of AURKA and FAM83A with immune cell infiltration, respectively. The results indicated that copy number appears to correlate with AURKA and FAM83A expression in LUAD (Figure S2A-B). Heatmap analysis between SCNA levels of AURAK, FAM83A expression levels and TILs in TISDIB database were also performed (Figure S2C-D). Furthermore, SCNA levels of AURKA and FAM83A were also negatively correlated with B cell and Dendritic cell infiltration levels (both r<0; both P<0.05) (Figure S2E-H).

Previous studies have found that decreased AURKA and FAM83A expression could exhibited significant response of immunomodulators. So, to identify the expression patterns of AURKA and FAM83A response to immunomodulators, the heatmap analysis was performed (Figure S3A-H). Besides, we also explored the AURKA and FAM83A expression distribution across LUAD subtype (Figure S3I-J). Furthermore, TP53 mutation as the most type of LUAD mutation was related to CD8+ T cell, Neutrophil and Dendritic Cell infiltration levels (Figure S3K).

 Figure 6 

AURKA and FAM83A correlated enrichment gene analysis with GSEA.

 Figure 7 

(A-B) AURKA and FAM83A expression levels in various cancer and normal tissues. (C) Correlation between AURKA and FAM83A expression levels as tumor purity increasing. (D-E) AURKA and FAM83A expression levels in different stages of LUAD. (F-G) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis by different AURKA and FAM83A expression levels of LUAD. (H-I) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis by different AURKA and FAM83A expression levels of LUAD. (J) Cumulative survival rates between low and high immune cell (B Cell and Dendritic Cell) infiltration.

Discussion

In this study, we firstly screened 45 DEGs in smoking related LUAD and performed functional enrichment analysis. Then according to an independent cohort from TCGA database, we performed a Cox's regression model and identified four prognosis-related genes. While after we validate their expression levels and their relation to OS in GEPIA and Kaplan Meier-plotter databases, there are only AURKA and FAM83A left for further immune-related mechanism exploration. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated survival rates are related to different immune cell (B cell and dendritic cell) infiltration levels, so we further explore the correlation between these two gene expression levels and immune cell infiltration levels as well as their response to immunomodulators. The results suggested that, AURKA and FAM83A are highly expressed in smoking related LUAD, and negatively correlated to B cell and Dendritic cell infiltration levels, at the same time, B cell and Dendritic cell infiltration levels also related to the prognosis of LUAD. Besides, AURKA and FAM83A maybe could improve the prognosis of LUAD through regulated the response to immunomodulators.

Aurora kinase A (AURKA) is a putative low-penetrance tumor susceptibility gene in cell cycle regulation and centrosomal function [17], which is essential for centrosome function and maturation, spindle assembly, chromosome alignment, and mitotic entry [18]. AURKA had been well studied in many cancers, such as gastrointestinal cancer [19], colorectal cancer [20], breast cancer [21], bladder cancer [22] as well as lung cancer [23,24]. Recent studies indicated AURKA is associated with resistance to EGFR inhibitors in EGFR-mutant LUAD [25], and increased AURKA expression is associated with poor prognosis of NSCLC patients [26]. Besides, AURKA inhibitor had been proved to anticancer therapy, including VX-680 [27], Hesperidin [28], AZD1152 [29] and MLN8237 [30], while they still need to be approved for clinical use by the food and drug administration (FDA). Family with sequence similarity 83 (FAM83A), located on chromosome 8q24, which is the smallest member of the FAM83 family [31]. FAM83A have been reported related to breast cancer [32], pancreatic cancer [33], hepatocellular carcinoma [34], ovarian cancer [35], especially in lung cancer [36]. Recently, FAM83A was identified as survival‑related gene of LUAD [37, 38]. A newly released study demonstrated that FAM83A could affects PD-L1 expression levels in LUAD cell and could be a biomarker for immune escape and PD-1/PD-L1- targeted therapy [39]. Another study claimed that the effect of FAM83A proteins mutation is prevent them from binding to CK1, which will regulate cell division and apoptosis and lead to cancer development [40]. Although there are many researches discussed about the function of AURKA and FAM83A, there is barely any research explore the relation between their expression and immune cell infiltration levels.

 Figure 8 

(A) Correlation between AURKA expression level and immune cell (B Cell and Dendritic Cell) infiltration level. (B) Correlation between FAM83A expression level and immune cell (B Cell and Dendritic Cell) infiltration level. (C-D) Heatmap analysis of AURAK and FAM83A expression levels and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. (E) Correlation between AURKA expression level and B Cell infiltration level. (F) Correlation between AURKA expression level and Dendritic Cell infiltration level. (G) Correlation between FAM83A expression level and B Cell infiltration level. (H) Correlation between FAM83A expression level and Dendritic Cell infiltration level.

It is important that TILs are related to prognosis of several cancers, including colorectal cancer [41], ovarian cancer [42], breast cancer [43] as well as lung cancer [44]. Besides, the significance of TILs on the prognosis of many cancer types has been examined. TILs could be affected by many factors. There is one study elucidated the epidural anaesthesia could preserves immune function and affect TILs [45]. According to another study, researchers found that tumor areas with CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes have a better prognosis [46]. High expression level of CD45RO+ TILs are related to a better OS in LUAD [47]. Furthermore, AURKAi is reported to promote the recruitment of TILs in melanoma cells [48]. There is also another study suggested that the therapeutic relevance of AURKA could be an immunotherapy target [49]. While the relationships between AURKA, FAM83A expression and TILs expression level remains unclear. In the present study, we identified that tumor-infiltrating B cells and dendritic cells are negatively correlated to the AURKA and FAM83A expression levels, which could affect the prognosis of smoking related LUAD.

Lymphocyte infiltration has been identified as potential prognostic biomarkers during the tumor progression. More and more evidence suggested that tumor-infiltrating B cells could affect clinical outcomes among various cancers [50]. There is one study indicated that B cell-derived lymphotoxin could promote cancer progression in prostate cancer through activate I kappa B kinase (IKK)-α and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) signaling [51]. Besides, tumor-infiltrating B cells have inhibited tumor progress by activating CD8+ T cells [52]. Dendritic cells (DCs) play critical roles and initiated primary T-cell responses [53]. Several studies suggested that infiltrating DCs distributed in NSCLC tumor areas [54-56]. Meanwhile, the association between infiltrating DCs levels and smoking related LUAD have not been identified [55]. So, we also explored the correlation between these two gene expression levels and immune cell infiltration levels as well as the response to immunomodulators.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our present study suggested that AURKA and FAM83A are elevated in smoking related LUAD tissues. Besides, their overexpressed levels have a worse prognosis in smoking related LUAD. Furthermore, we also investigated the relationship between AURKA, FAM83A expression levels and TILs. The results indicated that AURKA and FAM83A were negatively correlated to B cell and Dendritic cell infiltration levels. However, it is still important to further explore the molecular mechanisms of AURKA and FAM83A contributing to smoking related LUAD through TILs in the future.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary figures and tables.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Major Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of Shandong Province (2018CXGC1212), the CSCO-Qilu Cancer Research Fund (Y-Q201802-014), the Medical and Health Technology Innovation Plan of Jinan City (201805002).

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

References

1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:7-30

2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:7-30

3. Zappa C, Mousa SA. Non-small cell lung cancer: current treatment and future advances. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2016;5:288-300

4. Nakamura H, Saji H. Worldwide trend of increasing primary adenocarcinoma of the lung. Surg Today. 2014;44:1004-12

5. Hanna JM, Onaitis MW. Cell of origin of lung cancer. J Carcinog. 2013;12:6

6. Tanner NT, Kanodra NM, Gebregziabher M. et al. The Association between Smoking Abstinence and Mortality in the National Lung Screening Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193:534-41

7. Li F, Xiang BB, Jin Y. et al. Hepatotoxic effects of inhalation exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on lipid metabolism of C57BL/6 mice. Environ Int. 2020;134:105000

8. Govindan R, Ding L, Griffith M. et al. Genomic Landscape of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Smokers and Never-Smokers. Cell. 2012;150:1121-34

9. Imielinski M, Berger AH, Hammerman PS. et al. Mapping the Hallmarks of Lung Adenocarcinoma with Massively Parallel Sequencing. Cell. 2012;150:1107-20

10. Kim A, Lee SJ, Ahn J. et al. The prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes assessment with hematoxylin and eosin sections in resected primary lung adenocarcinoma. Plos One. 2019;14:e0224430

11. Aguilar-Cazares D, Meneses-Flores M, Prado-Garcia H. et al. Relationship of Dendritic Cell Density, HMGB1 Expression, and Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinomas. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2014;22:105-13

12. Zhuang X, Xia X, Wang C. et al. A high number of CD8+ T cells infiltrated in NSCLC tissues is associated with a favorable prognosis. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2010;18:24-8

13. Schalper KA, Brown J, Carvajal-Hausdorf D. et al. Objective measurement and clinical significance of TILs in non-small cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107:dju435

14. Mori M, Ohtani H, Naito Y. et al. Infiltration of CD8+ T cells in non-small cell lung cancer is associated with dedifferentiation of cancer cells, but not with prognosis. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2000;191:113-8

15. Wakabayashi O, Yamazaki K, Oizumi S. et al. CD4+ T cells in cancer stroma, not CD8+ T cells in cancer cell nests, are associated with favorable prognosis in human non-small cell lung cancers. Cancer Sci. 2003;94:1003-9

16. Kinoshita T, Kudo-Saito C, Muramatsu R. et al. Determination of poor prognostic immune features of tumour microenvironment in non-smoking patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2017;86:15-27

17. Taylor NJ, Bensen JT, Poole C. et al. Genetic variation in cell cycle regulatory gene AURKA and association with intrinsic breast cancer subtype. Mol Carcinog. 2015;54:1668-77

18. Goldberg SL, Fenaux P, Craig MD. et al. An exploratory phase 2 study of investigational Aurora A kinase inhibitor alisertib (MLN8237) in acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. Leuk Res Rep. 2014;3:58-61

19. Wang-Bishop L, Chen Z, Gomaa A. et al. Inhibition of AURKA Reduces Proliferation and Survival of Gastrointestinal Cancer Cells with Activated KRAS by Preventing Activation of RPS6KB1. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:662-75

20. Wu C, Lyu J, Yang EJ. et al. Targeting AURKA-CDC25C axis to induce synthetic lethality in ARID1A-deficient colorectal cancer cells. Nat Commun. 2018;9:3212

21. Donnella HJ, Webber JT, Levin RS. et al. Kinome rewiring reveals AURKA limits PI3K-pathway inhibitor efficacy in breast cancer. Nat Chem Biol. 2018;14:768-77

22. Guo M, Lu S, Huang H. et al. Increased AURKA promotes cell proliferation and predicts poor prognosis in bladder cancer. BMC Syst Biol. 2018;12:118

23. Schneider MA, Christopoulos P, Muley T. et al. AURKA, DLGAP5, TPX2, KIF11 and CKAP5: Five specific mitosis-associated genes correlate with poor prognosis for non-small cell lung cancer patients. Int J Oncol. 2017;50:365-72

24. Zhang MY, Liu XX, Li H. et al. Elevated mRNA Levels of AURKA, CDC20 and TPX2 are associated with poor prognosis of smoking related lung adenocarcinoma using bioinformatics analysis. Int J Med Sci. 2018;15:1676-85

25. Shah KN, Bhatt R, Rotow J. et al. Aurora kinase A drives the evolution of resistance to third-generation EGFR inhibitors in lung cancer. Nature Medicine. 2019;25:111-118

26. Al-Khafaji ASK, Marcus MW, Davies MPA. et al. AURKA mRNA expression is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol Lett. 2017;13:4463-8

27. Harrington EA, Bebbington D, Moore J. et al. VX-680, a potent and selective small-molecule inhibitor of the Aurora kinases, suppresses tumor growth in vivo. Nat Med. 2004;10:262-7

28. Hauf S, Cole RW, LaTerra S. et al. The small molecule Hesperadin reveals a role for Aurora B in correcting kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in maintaining the spindle assembly checkpoint. J Cell Biol. 2003;161:281-94

29. Yang J, Ikezoe T, Nishioka C. et al. AZD1152, a novel and selective aurora B kinase inhibitor, induces growth arrest, apoptosis, and sensitization for tubulin depolymerizing agent or topoisomerase II inhibitor in human acute leukemia cells in vitro and in vivo. Blood. 2007;110:2034-40

30. Gorgun G, Calabrese E, Hideshima T. et al. A novel Aurora-A kinase inhibitor MLN8237 induces cytotoxicity and cell-cycle arrest in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2010;115:5202-13

31. Li YY, Dong XY, Yin YH. et al. BJ-TSA-9, a novel human tumor-specific gene, has potential as a biomarker of lung cancer. Neoplasia. 2005;7:1073-80

32. Liu L, Ma CH, Xu Q. et al. A rapid nested polymerase chain reaction method to detect circulating cancer cells in breast cancer patients using multiple marker genes. Oncol Lett. 2014;7:2192-8

33. Chen S, Huang J, Liu Z. et al. FAM83A is amplified and promotes cancer stem cell-like traits and chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer. Oncogenesis. 2017;6:e300

34. Liu C, Peng XM, Li YH. et al. Positive feedback loop of FAM83A/PI3K/AKT/c-Jun induces migration, invasion and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2020;123:109780

35. Tomar T, Alkema NG, Schreuder L. et al. Methylome analysis of extreme chemoresponsive patients identifies novel markers of platinum sensitivity in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Bmc Medicine. 2017;15:116

36. Wang YY, Xu RJ, Zhang DY. et al. Circ-ZKSCAN1 regulates FAM83A expression and inactivates MAPK signaling by targeting miR-330-5p to promote non-small cell lung cancer progression. Translational Lung Cancer Research. 2019;8:862-875

37. Wang YY, Lu T, Wo Y. et al. Identification of a putative competitive endogenous RNA network for lung adenocarcinoma using TCGA datasets. Peer J. 2019;7:e6809

38. Yu J, Hou M, Pei TX. FAM83A Is a Prognosis Signature and Potential Oncogene of Lung Adenocarcinoma. DNA Cell Biol. 2020;39:890-9

39. Zhou FR, Wang X, Liu F. et al. FAM83A drives PD-L1 expression via ERK signaling and FAM83A/PD-L1 co-expression correlates with poor prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma. International Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2020;25:1612-1623

40. Fulcher LJ, Bozatzi P, Tachie-Menson T. et al. The DUF1669 domain of FAM83 family proteins anchor casein kinase 1 isoforms. Science Signaling. 2018;11:eaao2341

41. Chen G, Wang L, Diao T. et al. Analysis of immune-related signatures of colorectal cancer identifying two different immune phenotypes: Evidence for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Oncol Lett. 2020;20:517-24

42. Santoiemma PP, Powell DJ Jr. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in ovarian cancer. Cancer Biol Ther. 2015;16:807-20

43. Stanton SE, Disis ML. Clinical significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 2016;4:59

44. Bremnes RM, Busund LT, Kilvaer TL. et al. The Role of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Development, Progression, and Prognosis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11:789-800

45. Li MH, Xu ZZ, Huang SM. et al. Effect of combined epidural anaesthesia on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in lung adenocarcinoma: a prospective exploratory sub-analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018;62:687-700

46. Uryvaev A, Passhak M, Hershkovits D. et al. The role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) as a predictive biomarker of response to anti-PD1 therapy in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer or metastatic melanoma. Med Oncol. 2018;35:25

47. Hu Z, Gu X, Zhong R. et al. Tumor-infiltrating CD45RO (+) memory cells correlate with favorable prognosis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10:2089-99

48. Vilgelm AE, Johnson CA, Prasad N. et al. Connecting the Dots: Therapy-Induced Senescence and a Tumor-Suppressive Immune Microenvironment. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108:djv406

49. Safi S, Yamauchi Y, Rathinasamy A. et al. Functional T cells targeting tumor-associated antigens are predictive for recurrence-free survival of patients with radically operated non-small cell lung cancer. Oncoimmunology. 2017;6:e1360458

50. Wouters MCA, Nelson BH. Prognostic Significance of Tumor-Infiltrating B Cells and Plasma Cells in Human Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:6125-35

51. Ammirante M, Luo JL, Grivennikov S. et al. B-cell-derived lymphotoxin promotes castration-resistant prostate cancer. Nature. 2010;464:302-5

52. Ritchie DS, Yang J, Hermans IF. et al. B-Lymphocytes activated by CD40 ligand induce an antigen-specific anti-tumour immune response by direct and indirect activation of CD8(+) T-cells. Scand J Immunol. 2004;60:543-51

53. Palucka K, Banchereau J. Cancer immunotherapy via dendritic cells. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:265-77

54. Mu CY, Huang JA, Chen Y. et al. High expression of PD-L1 in lung cancer may contribute to poor prognosis and tumor cells immune escape through suppressing tumor infiltrating dendritic cells maturation. Med Oncol. 2011;28:682-8

55. Kurabayashi A, Furihata M, Matsumoto M. et al. Distribution of tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells in human non-small cell lung carcinoma in relation to apoptosis. Pathol Int. 2004;54:302-10

56. Zeid NA, Muller HK. S100 Positive Dendritic Cells in Human Lung-Tumors Associated with Cell-Differentiation and Enhanced Survival. Pathology. 1993;25:338-43

Author contact

Corresponding author: Prof. Yiqing Qu, MD, PhD, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Wenhuaxi Road 107#, Jinan 250012, China. Tel: +86 531 8216 9335; Fax: +86 531 8296 7544; E-mail: quyiqingedu.cn.

Received 2020-7-30
Accepted 2020-12-23
Published 2021-1-18

Citation styles

©2024 Ivyspring International Publisher. Terms of use