J Cancer 2021; 12(10):2797-2806. doi:10.7150/jca.54482 This issue Cite
Research Paper
State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
* These authors contributed equally to this work.
Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive tumors with poor prognosis and new targetable therapies are urgently required. CSE1L (chromosome segregation 1 like) is thought to play an important role in tumorigenesis and acts as a cancer therapeutic target. However, the biological function and the underlying mechanism of CSE1L in pancreatic cancer are still not fully explicit. In the present study, we found that high CSE1L expression was related to a worse prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer according to data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Additionally, we found that CSE1L knockdown inhibited the proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells and promoted apoptosis, while CSE1L overexpression demonstrated the opposite phenomenon. Furthermore, we discovered that CSE1L might regulate pancreatic cancer proliferation through AKT signaling pathway. In summary, we reveal that CSE1L plays a crucial role in tumor growth and may serve as a potential prognostic and therapeutic target for pancreatic cancer.
Keywords: pancreatic cancer, CSE1L, proliferation, AKT/mTOR signaling pathway.
Pancreatic cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Of the new cancer cases that occurred worldwide in 2018, pancreatic cancer was the seventh leading cause of cancer-related death in both males and females with almost as many deaths as cases [1]. Besides, it is expected to become the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States by 2030 [2]. According to existing treatments for patients suffering from pancreatic cancer, the 5-year survival rate remains remarkably low, at approximately 9% [1, 3]. However, the complex molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in pancreatic cancer have not been fully elucidated. Therefore, it is urgent to explore the mechanism and clarify new targets for pancreatic cancer treatment.
Malfunction of nuclear-cytoplasmic transport is deemed to contribute to tumorigenesis mediated by proteins among which exportins exhibit tremendous function. Exportins include the following seven members: XPO1, CSE1L (XPO2), XPOT, XPO4, XPO5, XPO6 and XPO7 [4]. Overexpression of exportins has been reported among a range of cancers, with impacts on cell growth, differentiation, drug resistance, and tumor microenvironment [4, 5]. However, the involvement of the exportins in pancreatic cancer remains unknown, except for XPO1. Here, we analyzed the mRNA expression levels of these exportins using the GEO, UALCAN and ONCOMINE databases. According to the above databases, CSE1L was the only exportin that overexpressed in pancreatic cancer tissues. Therefore, we identified CSE1L as the exportin with the greatest potential that may play vital roles in pancreatic cancer.
CSE1L (chromosome segregation 1 like), also known as CAS, CSE1 or XPO2, is an exportin. The CSE1L gene, located on chromosome 20q13, encodes a protein of 100-kDa molecular weight [6]. CSE1L functions as an oncogene in certain types of tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma [7], gastric cancer [8], colorectal cancer [9], breast cancer [10] and ovarian cancer [11], oral cancer [12] and osteosarcoma [13]. However, the role and underlying mechanism of CSE1L in pancreatic cancer is still not fully explicit.
In the present study, we examined CSE1L expression in pancreatic cancer tissues using three online datasets and our own tissue samples. We also analyzed prognosis of CSE1L expression and its correlation with the clinicopathological features of pancreatic cancer. Next, we performed loss-of-function and gain-of-function assays to explore the function of CSE1L of pancreatic cancer in vitro and in vivo. We demonstrated that CSE1L promoted the proliferation of pancreatic cancer. In addition, we revealed that CSE1L participates in the AKT signaling pathway.
Taken together, our findings suggest that CSE1L offers significant clues for further study of the mechanism and clinical therapy of pancreatic cancer.
90 pancreatic cancer tissue samples and 79 corresponding non-tumor tissue samples were collected from the Department of Pathology at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, between January 2012 and December 2016. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University and the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. This study was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All of the patients were diagnosed, and the diagnosis was confirmed by histology. Tissue microarrays was constructed by Shanghai Outdo Biotech Company (China). Clinicopathological information included age, gender, clinical stage, invasion depth, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis and tumor differentiation. The median age was 62 years (range: 31-78 years).
Tissue microarray were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in a graded alcohol. Then, the sections were blocked with 3% H2O2, and antigen retrieval was performed by heating the sections in citrate buffer. The sections were incubated with an antibody against CSE1L (Proteintech) at 4°C overnight, followed by incubation with biotinylated secondary antibodies. Assessment of IHC staining was independently performed by two expert pathologists. CSE1L protein expressions were scored according to staining intensity and the percentage of positive cells. The percentage of positive cells was scored as follows: 0% (0), 1-10% (1), 11-50% (2), 51-80% (3), 81-100% (4). Staining intensity was scored as follows: no staining (0), week (1), moderate (2), and strong (3). Comprehensive score = staining percentage × intensity. CSE1Lprotein expression was classified as follows: < 6 low expression, ≥ 6 high expression.
Five cell lines were used, Human normal pancreatic ductal cells HPNE and pancreatic cancer cell lines PANC1, AsPC1, CFPAC1 and human embryonic kidney cells 293T. HPNE and Human embryonic kidney 293T cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). PANC1, AsPC1, and CFPAC1 were obtained from the Cellular Institute of Chinese Academy of Science (Shanghai, China). These cells were incubated in medium supplemented with 10% FBS (Biowest, South America), 100 µ/ml penicillin (Sigma-Aldrich), and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich). DMEM, RPMI 1640 and IMDM were used for PANC1, AsPC1, and CFPAC1, respectively. All cells were incubated at 37°C in humidified air with 5% CO2.
Total RNA samples from the pancreatic cell lines used in this study were extracted with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocol and were quantified with Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo, Japan). A PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (TaKaRa, China) was used to synthesize first-strand cDNA, which was used as the template for real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). qPCR was performed three times with SYBR Green Premix Ex Taq (TaKaRa, China). The specific primers for the target genes are listed in Supplementary Table S1. β-actin was used as the internal control.
siRNA oligonucleotides targeting CSE1L were designed and synthesized by RiboBio (Guangzhou, China). The sequences of the siRNAs used were as follows: si-CSE1L-1, GGATAATGTTATCAAAGTA; si-CSE1L-2, CGACGGTATCAAATATATT. Scrambled siRNAs targeting no known gene sequences were used as the negative control. Lipofectamine 3000 Reagent (Invitrogen) was used to conduct siRNA transfection according to the manufacturer's protocol. After transfection for 48 h, the cells were used for RNA extraction, immunoblotting and viability assays.
Full-length CSE1L cDNA was cloned and inserted into the lentiviral expression vector pWPXL (Addgene). To produce the intended lentivirus, the constructed plasmids and lentiviral vector packaging system were transfected into HEK-293T cells using Lipofectamine 2000. After 48 hours, the supernatants from the HEK-293T cultures were collected to infect PANC1 cells/AsPC1 cells.
For the proliferation assay, 48 h after siRNA transfection, cells were diluted with complete medium and then, 5000 cells were seeded into each well of a 96-well plate and incubated. A 10 μL aliquot of Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8) (Dojindo) was added to triplicate wells, and incubated for 1-2 h, and absorbance was measured at 450 nm. Each measurement was performed in triplicate, and experiments were repeated twice.
Aberrant expression level of exportins in pancreatic cancer patients. (A) Heatmap of the seven exportins mRNA expression in GSE16515. (B) The mRNA expression of seven exportins in pancreatic cancer tissues assessed using data from GSE16515. (C) Expression panels for seven exportins comparing the data between 4 normal individuals and 178 pancreatic cancer patients in the TCGA database. (D) Seven exportins mRNA expression levels in 20 different cancer types by using the ONCOMINE database. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
For the colony formation assay, 48 hours after siRNA transfection, PANC1 or AsPC1 or CFPAC1 cells (2000 cells/well) were seeded in 6-well plates. After 10-14 days of incubation, cells in each well were fixed with 100% methanol for 20 min, and stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 20 min, and cell colonies were counted. All assays were independently performed in triplicate.
Forty-eight hours after siRNA transfection, cells and medium were collected. Cells were stained with Annexin V-FITC/AAD and propidium iodide (BD Biosciences) in the dark at room temperature. After 15 min, the cells were analyzed using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). The results were analyzed using FlowJo software. Assays were independently performed three times.
The lysates were extracted from cultured cells and then separated using 8% or 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), followed by transferring onto nitrocellulose membranes (Millipore). Next, we blocked the membranes in 5% milk with phosphate-buffered saline. After one hour of blocking, the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies (Supplementary Table 2) at 4°C overnight. The next day, the membranes were incubated with HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Sigma-Aldrich) or HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Sigma-Aldrich) secondary antibodies. Subsequently, visualization was performed with SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Thermo, USA).
All methods were performed in accordance with the guidelines for animal experimentation and approved by the Experimental Animal Ethics Committee of Shanghai Jiaotong University. The stably transfected cell lines PANC1-pWPXL and PANC-CSE1L-OE (4×106 cells/each) were subcutaneously implanted into BALB/c nude mice, respectively. A total of 12 nude mice were used with 6 mice in each group. Tumor size was measured every twice a week and calculated using the following equation: Volume (mm3) = (length × width 2)/2. After 50 days, the mice were euthanized, and the tumors were excised and weighed.
The data were imaged with GraphPad Prism 5 software. The quantitative variables were presented as the means and S.E.M. Student's t test or Chi-square tests were used between the two groups. P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed with SPSS software (version 19.0).
To explore the expression of the seven exportins in pancreatic cancer, we analyzed their mRNA expression levels using data from GSE16515 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gds), the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/) and the ONCOMINE database (https://www.oncomine.org/). First, we mined the differentially expressed genes between pancreatic cancer tissues and adjacent normal tissues in the GSE16515 dataset. As is shown in Fig. 1A and B, compared with normal pancreatic tissues, tumor tissues had significant overexpression of CSE1L, XPO1, XPO4, XPO5, and XPO6. Next, the gene expression landscape of XPOs were measured by UALCAN (http://ualcan.path.uab.edu/), resources of which were based upon data from 31 cancer types of the TCGA database. As is shown in Fig. 1C, CSE1L, XPO1, XPO5 and XPO6 exerted higher mRNA expression in pancreatic cancer tissues compared to nontumorous tissues. Moreover, the ONCOMINE database showed that CSE1L exhibited higher mRNA expression in pancreatic cancer tissues (Fig. 1D). According to the above databases, CSE1L was the only exportin that upregulated in pancreatic cancer tissues. Therefore, we identified CSE1L as the research subject.
Furthermore, to better understand the impact of CSE1L gene expression on the overall survival of pancreatic cancer patients, we utilized the TCGA data to assess the prognostic value of CSE1L. The database showed that higher CSE1L expression was associated with worse outcomes in pancreatic cancer patients (P = 0.0054) (Fig. 2A).We next analyzed the correlation between CSE1L expression levels and the clinicopathological parameters of pancreatic cancer patients by the UALCAN database. As shown in Fig. 2B, the mRNA expression level of CSE1L in stage II groups were remarkably upregulated compared with that in normal tissues. To further determine the clinicopathological significance of CSE1L in pancreatic cancer, we performed IHC analysis of CSE1L in a tissue microarray that included an independent set of 90 cases of pancreatic cancer tissues. Representative IHC images of CSE1L expression are shown in Fig. 2C. The CSE1L protein was localized in both cell nucleus and cytoplasm. Of the 90 tumor tissue samples, high CSE1L protein levels were found in 60% (54 of 90) of pancreatic cancer tissues, compared with only 35.4% (28 of 79) of normal tissues (p = 0.0013). Correlations between the CSE1L expression level and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with pancreatic cancer are summarized in Table 1.
The expression of CSE1L was much higher in pancreatic cancer cell lines than in normal human pancreatic ductal cells (Fig. 2D). To investigate the functional roles of CSE1L in pancreatic cancer progression, we knocked down CSE1L via independent siRNAs significantly in PANC1, AsPC1, CFPAC1 cells. The knockdown efficiency of CSE1L was validated by qPCR and western blotting assays (Fig. 3A). Next, the results of CCK8 and colony formation assays showed that knockdown of CSE1L significantly suppressed proliferation in PANC1, AsPC1 and CFPAC1 cells (Fig. 3B and C). Conversely, stable cell lines (CSE1L) were established via lentiviral infection in PANC1 and AsPC1 cell lines. The efficiency of CSE1L overexpression was validated by qPCR and western blotting assays (Fig. 4A). Overexpression of CSE1L significantly enhanced the proliferation of PANC1 and AsPC1 cells (Fig. 4 B and C). Moreover, a subcutaneous tumor transplantation test showed that overexpression of CSE1L promoted the proliferation in vivo (Fig. 4D). Taken together, these results indicated that CSE1L acted as an important tumor driver in pancreatic cancer proliferation.
Correlation between the clinicopathological characteristics and CSE1L expression level in pancreatic cancer.
Characteristic | Case n | CSE1L expression level | χ2 value | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low | High | ||||
Age/year | |||||
< 60 | 29 | 14 | 15 | 1.221 | 0.269 |
≥ 60 | 61 | 22 | 39 | ||
Gender | |||||
Male | 62 | 22 | 40 | 1.694 | 0.193 |
Female | 28 | 14 | 14 | ||
Clinical stage | |||||
Early stages (≤I) | 10 | 8 | 2 | 7.5 | 0.006* |
Advanced stages (>I) | 80 | 28 | 52 | ||
Invasion depth | |||||
T1+T2 | 17 | 12 | 5 | 8.171 | 0.004* |
T3+T4 | 73 | 24 | 49 | ||
Lymph nodes metastasis | |||||
Yes | 53 | 20 | 33 | 0.275 | 0.6 |
No | 37 | 16 | 21 | ||
Distant metastasis | |||||
Yes | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1.2 | 0.338 |
No | 87 | 34 | 53 | ||
Differentiation | |||||
Well | 32 | 12 | 20 | 8.354 | 0.015* |
Moderately | 50 | 17 | 33 | ||
Poorly | 8 | 7 | 1 |
CSE1L is significantly overexpressed in both pancreatic cancer tissues and cell lines. (A)The prognostic value of the CSE1L expression level in pancreatic cancer patients; the survival curve was plotted utilizing the UALCAN database. (B) Relationship between the CSE1L expression level and pancreatic cancer clinical stages. (C) CSE1L is overexpressed in pancreatic cancer tissues. (D) CSE1L is overexpressed in pancreatic cancer cell lines.
Knockdown of CSE1L inhibits pancreatic cancer cell growth. (A) Western blot analyses showing the efficiency of CSE1L knockdown in PANC1 cells and AsPC1 cells, respectively. (B and C) Knockdown of CSE1L significantly suppressed the proliferation of PANC1, AsPC1 and CFPAC1 cells by CCK8 and colony formation assays. Data are representative of results from three independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
CSE1L has been reported to influence apoptosis in several cancers [8]. Therefore, we performed the flow cytometry analysis to determine the effect of CSE1L on apoptosis in different pancreatic cancer cells. As shown in Fig 5A and B, CSE1L knockdown in PANC1, AsPC1 and CFPAC1 cells significantly increased the percentage of apoptotic cells. Upon lentiviral overexpression of CSE1L, apoptotic cell death was considerably inhibited.
AKT/mTOR signaling is involved in CSE1L-mediated cancer growth [12]. Therefore, we detected the effect of CSE1L on the AKT/mTOR signaling pathways through western blotting in pancreatic cancer cell lines. As shown in Fig. 6 A and B, CSE1L knockdown inhibited the phosphorylation of AKT (Ser473) and mTOR (Ser2448) without influencing the total protein levels of both AKT and mTOR, whereas overexpression of CSE1L promoted phosphorylation of the corresponding sites of AKT and mTOR (Fig. 6 C and D). Therefore, these results show that the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway is crucial for CSE1L-mediated pancreatic cancer proliferation.
Pancreatic cancer is an extremely aggressive disease with worse outcomes. Despite a variety of studies exploring its biological mechanisms, the overall survival rate of PDAC patients has remained unchanged in recent years [14-16]. Therefore, it is urgent to explore new therapeutic targets for pancreatic cancer.
Overexpression of CSE1L promoted pancreatic cancer growth. (A)Western blot analyses showing the efficiency of CSE1L overexpression in PANC1 cells and AsPC1 cells, respectively. (B and C) Overexpression of CSE1L significantly promoted proliferation in PANC1 and AsPC1 cells by CCK8 and colony formation assays. Data are representative of results from three independent experiments. (D) CSE1L increases pancreatic cancer growth in vivo.*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
In recent years, many studies have shown that the expression of exportins is aberrant in numerous human cancers [17]. Identification of tumor-associated exportins is critical in tumorigenesis and may serve as novel therapeutic targets. XPO1 dysregulation indirectly regulates cellular functions such as cell proliferation, cellular transformation, apoptosis, and chromosome segregation [18]. In addition, XPO1 protein overexpression has been observed in glioma, gastric cancer, ovarian carcinoma, osteosarcoma and other cancers [19]. Furthermore, many inhibitors have been developed to block one of the exportins, XPO1. XPO1 inhibitors block nuclear export of XPO1 cargos, such as p53, p27, and eIF4E. Nuclear retention of these regulators resulted in subsequent activation of apoptotic- and stress-related gene expression [5, 20]. Besides, Vaidyanathan et al identified Exportin 2/CSE1L, Exportin 3/XPOT, Exportin 5/XPO5, and RANBP1 as novel potential targets of breast cancer by using publicly available datasets [21]. Chen et al identified high expression of XPO1, CSE1L, XPOT, XPO4/5/6 was related to poor overall survival of hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the involvement of the exportins in pancreatic cancer remains unknown, except for XPO1 [22]. Here, we analyzed the mRNA expression levels of these exportins in databases and finally identified CSE1L as our research object.
CSE1L influences apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells. (A) CSE1L knockdown in PANC1, AsPC1 and CFPAC1 cells significantly increased the percentage of apoptotic cells. (B) Overexpression of CSE1L significantly decreased the percentage of apoptotic cells. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
CSE1L regulates the AKT signaling pathway in pancreatic cancer cells. (A) Western blot analysis of p-AKT, AKT, p-mTOR and mTOR in cells transfected with CSE1L siRNAs. (B) Western blot analysis of p-AKT, AKT, p-mTOR and mTOR in cells stably over-expressing CSE1L. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
In the present study, the association between a negative prognosis and high CSE1L expression in pancreatic cancer was demonstrated. These results revealed that the CSE1L expression level was related to the outcome of patients with pancreatic cancer and may have a negative influence on pancreatic cancer patients. Therefore, CSE1L can serve as a potential prognostic indicator and treatment for pancreatic cancer.
To investigate the function of CSE1L in pancreatic cancer, we overexpressed and suppressed its expression in pancreatic cancer cells. Our experimental data revealed that knockdown of CSE1L inhibited cell proliferation and promoted apoptosis, while overexpression of CSE1L promoted cell proliferation. In addition, apoptosis assays revealed that CSE1L inhibited cell apoptosis. Wang et al confirmed that AKT/mTOR signaling is involved in CSE1L-mediated oral cancer growth [12]. Therefore, we carried out western blotting assays to verify alterations of the phosphorylation levels of AKT and mTOR in PANC1, AsPC1 and CFPAC1 cells. The results revealed that the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway is crucial for CSE1L-mediated pancreatic cancer proliferation.
In conclusion, the results of the present study allowed for a better understanding of the underlying mechanism of pancreatic cancer progression. CSE1L was found to be associated with a negative prognosis in pancreatic cancer patients. In addition, CSE1L might promoted proliferation of pancreatic cancer by targeting the AKT signaling pathway. More importantly, these findings suggest that CSE1L may serve as a potential prognostic and therapeutic target for pancreatic cancer.
Supplementary table S1.
This work was supported by grants from the Innovation Group Project of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (2019CXJQ03); National Natural Science Foundation of China (81802894, 81874048); Shanghai sailing program (20YF1446400); Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning (2018ZHYL0223).
The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.
1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394-424
2. Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. 2014;74:2913-21
3. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:7-30
4. Nachmias B, Schimmer AD. Targeting nuclear import and export in hematological malignancies. Leukemia. 2020;34:2875-86
5. Çağatay T, Chook YM. Karyopherins in cancer. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2018;52:30-42
6. Pimiento JM, Neill KG, Henderson-Jackson E, Eschrich SA, Chen D-T, Husain K. et al. Knockdown of CSE1L Gene in Colorectal Cancer Reduces Tumorigenesis in Vitro. Am J Pathol. 2016;186:2761-8
7. Qin L-X, Tang Z-Y. The prognostic molecular markers in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2002;8:385-92
8. Li Y, Yuan S, Liu J, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Chen X. et al. CSE1L silence inhibits the growth and metastasis in gastric cancer by repressing GPNMB via positively regulating transcription factor MITF. J Cell Physiol. 2020;235:2071-9
9. Jiang M-C, Yeh C-M, Tai C-J, Chen H-C, Lin S-H, Su T-C. et al. CSE1L modulates Ras-induced cancer cell invasion: correlation of K-Ras mutation and CSE1L expression in colorectal cancer progression. Am J Surg. 2013;206:418-27
10. Behrens P, Brinkmann U, Fogt F, Wernert N, Wellmann A. Implication of the proliferation and apoptosis associated CSE1L/CAS gene for breast cancer development. Anticancer Res. 2001;21:2413-7
11. Lorenzato A, Biolatti M, Delogu G, Capobianco G, Farace C, Dessole S. et al. AKT activation drives the nuclear localization of CSE1L and a pro-oncogenic transcriptional activation in ovarian cancer cells. Exp Cell Res. 2013;319:2627-36
12. Wang Y-S, Peng C, Guo Y, Li Y. CSE1L promotes proliferation and migration in oral cancer through positively regulating MITF. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24:5429-35
13. Cheng D-D, Lin H-C, Li S-J, Yao M, Yang Q-C, Fan C-Y. CSE1L interaction with MSH6 promotes osteosarcoma progression and predicts poor patient survival. Sci Rep. 2017;7:46238
14. Cui J, Quan M, Xie D, Gao Y, Guha S, Fallon MB. et al. A novel KDM5A/MPC-1 signaling pathway promotes pancreatic cancer progression via redirecting mitochondrial pyruvate metabolism. Oncogene. 2020;39:1140-51
15. Liu F, Ma J, Wang K, Li Z, Jiang Q, Chen H. et al. High expression of PDE4D correlates with poor prognosis and clinical progression in pancreaticductal adenocarcinoma. J Cancer. 2019;10:6252-60
16. Nie S, Qian X, Shi M, Li H, Peng C, Ding X. et al. ALDH1A3 Accelerates Pancreatic Cancer Metastasis by Promoting Glucose Metabolism. Front Oncol. 2020;10:915
17. Chen L, Huang Y, Zhou L, Lian Y, Wang J, Chen D. et al. Prognostic roles of the transcriptional expression of exportins in hepatocellular carcinoma. Biosci Rep. 2019;39:BSR20190827
18. Gruffaz M, Yuan H, Meng W, Liu H, Bae S, Kim J-S. et al. CRISPR-Cas9 Screening of Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus-Transformed Cells Identifies XPO1 as a Vulnerable Target of Cancer Cells. MBio. 2019;10:e00866-19
19. Gravina GL, Senapedis W, McCauley D, Baloglu E, Shacham S, Festuccia C. Nucleo-cytoplasmic transport as a therapeutic target of cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2014;7:85
20. Garzon R, Savona M, Baz R, Andreeff M, Gabrail N, Gutierrez M. et al. A phase 1 clinical trial of single-agent selinexor in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2017;129:3165-74
21. Vaidyanathan S, Thangavelu PU, Duijf PHG. Overexpression of Ran GTPase Components Regulating Nuclear Export, but not Mitotic Spindle Assembly, Marks Chromosome Instability and Poor Prognosis in Breast Cancer. Target Oncol. 2016;11:677-86
22. Birnbaum DJ, Finetti P, Birnbaum D, Mamessier E, Bertucci F. XPO1 Expression Is a Poor-Prognosis Marker in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. J Clin Med. 2019;8:596
Corresponding authors: Liwei Wang, M.D. & Phd, liweiwangedu.cn, State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Rd, Shanghai 200127, China. Tel: +86 21 58752345. Hechun Lin, cindyxiongcom State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 25/2200, Xietu Road, Shanghai 200032, China. Tel: +86 21 64183618; Fax: +86 21 64042002. Jiujie Cui, M.D. & Phd, cuijiujiecom. State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Rd, Shanghai 200127, China. Tel: +86 21 58752345.
Received 2020-10-14
Accepted 2021-2-14
Published 2021-3-14