J Cancer 2022; 13(10):3000-3012. doi:10.7150/jca.74930 This issue

Research Paper

Prognostic Value of CRP-Albumin-Lymphocyte (CALLY) Index in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Oral Cavity Cancer

Yao-Te Tsai1,2, Chien-An Ko1, Hung-Chin Chen1, Cheng-Ming Hsu1,2, Chia-Hsuan Lai2,3, Yi-Chan Lee2,4, Ming-Shao Tsai1,2, Geng-He Chang1,2, Ethan I. Huang1,2, Ku-Hao Fang2,5 Corresponding address

1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.
2. College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.
4. Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan.
5. Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
Tsai YT, Ko CA, Chen HC, Hsu CM, Lai CH, Lee YC, Tsai MS, Chang GH, Huang EI, Fang KH. Prognostic Value of CRP-Albumin-Lymphocyte (CALLY) Index in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Oral Cavity Cancer. J Cancer 2022; 13(10):3000-3012. doi:10.7150/jca.74930. Available from https://www.jcancer.org/v13p3000.htm

File import instruction


Graphic abstract

Background: The prognostic value of the CRP-albumin-lymphocyte index (CALLY index) was analyzed in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) undergoing curative surgery.

Methods: We retrospectively included 279 patients who were diagnosed as having primary OSCC and being treated with surgery. The optimal cutoff for the preoperative CALLY index was identified by considering the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; subsequently, the discriminatory ability of the cutoff was determined. We employed Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test to elucidate associations between the CALLY index and survival outcomes. We identified prognostic variables by using the Cox proportional hazards model. Finally, we devised a nomogram based on the CALLY index for predicting individualized survival.

Results: The cutoff value of the CALLY index was determined to be 0.65. A CALLY index < 0.65 exhibited a significant association with pathological aggressiveness as well as shorter overall and disease-free survival (OS and DFS, both P < 0.001). A low CALLY index was an independent risk factor for short OS and DFS [hazard ratio = 3.816; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.393-6.086; P < 0.001; and hazard ratio = 2.103; 95% CI 1.451-3.049; P < 0.001, respectively] in multivariate Cox analysis. The prognostic nomogram based on the CALLY index yielded accurate predictions of OS, as revealed by a concordance index of 0.797.

Conclusions: The preoperative CALLY index is easy and inexpensive to calculate and, in patients with OSCC, can be a valuable prognostic biomarker. The CALLY-index-based nomogram established in this study provides accurate survival predictions.

Keywords: CRP-albumin-lymphocyte index, oral cavity cancer, overall survival, disease-free survival, nomogram


In 2020, 377,713 new cases of oral cavity cancer were diagnosed, and globally, this type of cancer caused 177,757 deaths [1]. Histologically, oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common type of this cancer [2]. In Taiwan, the major OSCC risk factors remain cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and betel nut chewing [3]. Curative surgery is currently recognized as the mainstay of treatment for OSCC [4], and adjuvant therapy is recommended for those with factors indicating a poor prognosis, such as locally advanced T4 disease [5], poor tumor differentiation [6], perineural invasion (PNI) [7], cervical nodal metastasis [8], or extranodal extension (ENE) [9].

Inflammatory responses in the tumor microenvironment play critical roles in cancer development, tumor progression, and distant metastasis [10]. In addition, in patients with cancer, malnutrition is reported to be associated with poor chemotherapy response and low quality of life [11]. Therefore, a growing number of studies have identified the high value of using nutrition and inflammation parameters, such as the levels of albumin and serum C-reactive protein (CRP), to predict outcomes in patients with OSCC [12-15]. In those with OSCC, serum CRP—an acute inflammation protein produced by the liver—was demonstrated to be a prognostic indicator [13]. Albumin is the most abundant protein in human serum [16], and higher all-cause mortality was reported among patients with OSCC with a lower albumin level [12]. In addition, lymphocytes are pivotal components of the host anticancer immune response, and pretreatment lymphocyte count was reported to be an independent prognostic factor in human-papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal cancer [14]. By integrating the aforementioned parameters, Iida et al. proposed the novel CRP-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index—defined as serum albumin level (g/dL) × absolute lymphocyte count (cells/µL) / CRP level (mg/dL) × 104—and discovered a significant association between low CALLY index and poor overall survival (OS) in those with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy [17]. Given the high accessibility and cost-effectiveness of analyzing the inflammation and nutrition-based CALLY index, it may give physicians useful information for prognostication and optimization of treatment planning. Nevertheless, a lack of relevant information on OSCC has precluded the formation of a robust recommendation on use of the CALLY index for OSCC management. In this study, the prognostic value of the CALLY index in patients with surgically treated OSCC was investigated. Given that the CALLY index reflects the host's nutritional status and immuno-inflammation response, we hypothesized that in patients with OSCC, the CALLY index before treatment would be strongly associated with survival outcomes; therefore, the preoperative CALLY index would be useful for identifying patients with an unfavorable prognosis at an early stage. To improve the accuracy of individualized survival predictions and facilitate application of the CALLY index in clinical practice, this study employed the CALLY index to create a prognostic nomogram. The accuracy of OS prediction made using the proposed nomogram model was evaluated using concordance-index (C-index) and calibration plots.

Materials and methods

Study design and population

This retrospective study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the institutional review board of our hospital (No. 202100017B0C601) prior to commencement of the study. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. This study recruited 308 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed OSCC at our hospital. The study period was January 2008 to December 2017. The following eligibility criteria were employed: (1) age ≥ 18 years; (2) histopathological diagnosis of primary OSCC; (3) complete pretreatment laboratory data; and (4) underwent curative surgery to treat OSCC at the study hospital. We excluded 29 patients for the following reasons: (1) the presence of unresectable tumor, synchronous cancer, or distant metastasis upon diagnosis (n = 6); (2) neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgery (n = 2); (3) history of cancer or a hematologic disorder (n = 12); (4) evidence of an acute infection or severe inflammatory disease within the 1 month before surgery (n = 2); and (5) missing follow-up data (n = 7). Thus, the final analysis covered 279 patients.

Data collection

Medical staff reviewed the electronic medical records at our hospital and collected the clinical data of each enrolled patient. Within the 2 weeks prior to surgery, all patients underwent pretreatment workup in accordance with our institution's guidelines; this workup included a detailed physical examination and medical history taking, complete laboratory tests, chest radiography, nuclear bone scanning, head and neck computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasonography of the liver. When a patient was found to have locally advanced disease or suspicious metastatic lesions were identified in the aforementioned examinations, chest and abdominal CT scans and/or a positron emission tomography-CT scan would be arranged to enable precise tumor staging. The value of using clinicopathological features as prognostic factors was carefully reviewed; these features were as follows: sex; age at diagnosis; underlying comorbidities according to the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) [18]; tumor subsite and size; pathological cancer stage, as defined by the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth-edition cancer staging manual; ENE and PNI status; cancer cell differentiation; depth of invasion (DOI); nearest surgical margin; the need for and types of adjuvant therapy; and personal health-related habits. Cigarette smoking was defined as smoking ≥1 packet of cigarettes daily for ≥1 year; alcohol drinking was defined as consuming ≥2 alcoholic beverages weekly for more than half a year; and betel nut consumption was defined as chewing ≥3 betel nuts daily for ≥1 year [19]. Each patient was classified as having no, one, and two or all exposures if they had none, one, and two or more of the aforementioned personal habits, respectively. Documented symptoms and signs and laboratory test results indicated that the enrollees had no active infection.

Protocol of treatment

The patients' primary OSCC treatment was curative surgery; wide excision of the tumor as well as concurrent unilateral or bilateral neck dissection were employed. Plastic surgeons immediately reconstructed any surgical defects by using local or free flaps. In accordance with the results of an in-house tumor conference and our institution's guidelines, postoperative adjuvant therapy was applied in indicated patients; this therapy was administered within the 6 weeks after surgery. Lin et al. reported our institute's detailed adjuvant therapy guidelines for OSCC [5]. Briefly, patients with pathological T4 tumor and/or ipsilateral single nodal metastasis without ENE were administered postoperative radiotherapy (RT) [5]. Postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) was offered to patients with a positive surgical margin, multiple nodal metastases, or ENE [5]. In the adjuvant intensity-modulated RT, the primary tumor site and high risk areas were subjected to a cumulative radiation dose of 66 Gy; a 2-Gy daily dose of radiation was applied for 5 days per week. In the adjuvant CRT, intravenous cisplatin-based chemotherapy was administered at a weekly dose of 40 mg/m2 or triweekly dose of 100 mg/m2; the selection between these was made in accordance with the patient's general condition and oncologist's judgment.

Measurements of serum biomarkers

Serum biomarker-survival outcome associations were evaluated by routinely examining the biochemistry test results and peripheral blood counts in our central laboratory within the 2 weeks before surgery. We used a hematology analyzer (Sysmex SE-9000, Kobe, Japan) to obtain hematologic parameters including hemoglobin level and lymphocyte, neutrophil, and platelet counts. We employed the Cobas 8000 automated biochemistry analyzer (Roche Hitachi, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) to measure preoperative biochemical parameters, namely albumin and CRP (respective reference values: 3.5-5.5 g/dL and <0.5 mg/dL) levels. The CALLY index was determined using the following equation [17]:

CALLY index = albumin level (g/dL) × lymphocyte count (/μL) / CRP level (mg/dL) x 104

Follow-up plan

In the first and second year after surgery, patients were followed up every 2-3 months, with subsequent follow ups every 6 months. During each follow-up visit, a flexible endoscopic examination and a physical examination were routinely performed. Patients underwent MRI or CT every 6 months in the first 2 years after surgery; from the third postoperative year onward, follow-up imaging was performed once every year. We defined OS as the period from the date of curative surgery to that of all-cause mortality, being censored, or final follow-up. We defined disease-free survival (DFS) as the period from the date of curative surgery to that of cancer recurrence, distant metastasis, being censored, or the final follow-up. We considered the follow-up period as the interval between the date of curative surgery and December 31, 2019, or death, whichever occurred first. Survival information was collected from medical chart reviews and telephone interviews.

Statistical analysis

We report categorical data as numbers and percentages. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was employed to assess data normality, and we present normally and nonnormally distributed continuous variables by using the mean and standard deviation and the median and interquartile range, respectively. For continuous and categorical variables, we employed the Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests, respectively, for identifying intergroup differences in clinicopathological features. To identify the optimal cutoff values of serum biomarkers for OS, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves subjected to Youden's index correction were obtained; the corresponding area under the ROC curve (AUC) values were also calculated. For the survival analysis, we estimated the OS and DFS by using Kaplan-Meier analysis and determined intergroup survival differences through the log-rank test. We used the Cox proportional hazards model to identify independent DFS and OS risk factors; the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each factor are presented. Factors deemed to be significant in the univariate analysis (log-rank test: p < 0.1) were used in the multivariable model. The following clinicopathological variables included in the univariate and multivariate analyses (included in addition to the preoperative CALLY index) potentially confounded the prognosis of those with OSCC: sex, age at diagnosis (<65 or ≥65 years), overall stage, PNI (absent or present), cancer cell differentiation [well to moderately differentiated (W-D/M-D) or poorly differentiated (P-D)], nearest surgical margin (≥5 or <5 mm), tumor site (tongue, buccal mucosa, or other), personal habits (no, one, or two or all exposures), need for adjuvant CRT (no or yes), and underlying comorbidities (CCI: 0, 1, or ≥2). We used SPSS 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) for all statistical analyses, with two-sided p < 0.05 indicating a significant finding.

We used the “rms” package in R software (v. 5.1-0; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA) to establish a prognostic nomogram incorporating the preoperative CALLY index and clinicopathological features; the endpoints were 3-year and 5-year OS [20]. To ascertain the accuracy of OS predictions, we derived the C-index for our nomogram model as well as the conventional American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. Perfect and random predictability were considered to correspond to a C-index of 1.0 and 0.5, respectively. Moreover, we created calibration plots to assess how consistent the nomogram-derived OS predictions were with the actual survival outcomes.


Characteristics of study population

The patients' demographic and clinicopathological characteristics as well as the preoperative laboratory test results are summarized in Table 1. Overall, 279 patients with operated OSCC were enrolled, including 249 (89.2%) male patients and 201 (72.0%) patients were under the age of 65 years. The median (interquartile range) age at diagnosis was 56 (52-67) years, with the median (interquartile range) follow-up time being 48.1 (18.7-67.8) months. The tumor site was the tongue in 113 (40.5%) patients and buccal mucosa in 85 (30.5%) patients; these were the two most frequent tumor subsites in this study. Among the 279 patients, 52 (18.6%) had stage I, 38 (13.6%) had stage II, 45 (16.1%) had stage III, and 144 (51.6%) had stage IV OSCC. Regarding regional lymph node involvement, 100 patients (35.8%) had pathologically confirmed cervical nodal metastases, and 55 (19.7%) had ENE. Presence of PNI and a DOI of more than 10 mm were observed in 25.1% (n = 70) and 47.7% (n = 133) of the enrolled patients, respectively. In addition, most patients (n = 248, 88.9%) had W-D/M-D OSCC. Nearly three quarters of patients (n = 206, 73.8%) were reported as having the nearest surgical margin ≥ 5 mm. As for underlying comorbidities, 145 (52.0%) patients had a CCI of 0, 82 (29.4%) patients had a CCI of 1, and 52 (18.6%) patients had a CCI of 2 or greater. Among the included patients, the vast majority smoked (n = 231, 82.8%), chewed betel nuts (n = 222, 79.6%), and drank alcohol (n = 187, 67.0%). All enrolled patients completed the treatment course; 134 (48.2%) patients underwent curative surgery alone, 39 (13.9%) had adjuvant RT, and 106 (37.9%) underwent adjuvant CRT. Prior to surgery, 7 of the 279 (2.5%) patients received a nasogastric feeding tube because of poor oral intake and remarkable malnutrition.

 Table 1 

Baseline characteristics of study participants

Age (years)
< 65201 (72.0%)
≥ 6578 (28.0%)
Men249 (89.2%)
Women30 (10.8%)
Site of the primary tumor
Tongue113 (40.5%)
Buccal mucosa85 (30.5%)
Gingiva34 (12.2%)
Retromolar trigone18 (6.5%)
Mouth floor13 (4.7%)
Lip11 (3.9%)
Hard palate5 (1.7%)
AJCC stage
I52 (18.6%)
II38 (13.6%)
III45 (16.1%)
IV144 (51.7%)
Tumor size (T classification)
T170 (25.1%)
T252 (18.6%)
T344 (15.8%)
T4113 (40.5%)
Nodal metastasis (N classification)
N0179 (64.2%)
N130 (10.8%)
N255 (19.7%)
N315 (5.3%)
PNI70 (25.1%)
ENE55 (19.7%)
Cancer cell differentiation
W-D/M-D248 (88.9%)
P-D31 (11.1%)
Surgical margin
≥ 5 mm206 (73.8%)
< 5 mm73 (26.2%)
DOI ≥ 10 mm133 (47.7%)
0145 (52.0%)
182 (29.4%)
≥ 252 (18.6%)
Personal Habits
Cigarette Smoking231 (82.8%)
Betel nut chewing222 (79.6%)
Alcohol consumption187 (67.0%)
Surgery only134 (48.0%)
Surgery + RT39 (14.0%)
Surgery + CRT106 (38.0%)
Laboratory results
WBC (X103/μL), median (IQR)7.70 (6.30-9.70)
Neutrophil (X103/μL), median (IQR)4.80 (3.59-6.44)
Lymphocyte (X103/μL), median (IQR)2.01 (1.58-2.59)
CRP (mg/dL), median (IQR)0.36 (0.13-1.52)
Albumin (g/dL), median (IQR)4.43 (4.10-4.68)
CALLY index, median (IQR)2.51 (0.52-7.45)

ROC curve analysis

ROC curve analysis revealed that the optimal OS cutoff of the CALLY index was 0.65 (sensitivity, 84.1%; specificity, 60.5%, P < 0.001, Figure 1). To compare the prognostic discrimination between the CALLY index and its components—serum albumin level, lymphocyte count, and CRP level [13, 21, 22]—we performed the ROC curve analysis of these markers and compared the corresponding AUCs. Table 2 presents these comparisons. The CALLY index was discovered to have a higher AUC (0.740, 95% CI: = 0.676-0.806, P < 0.001) than albumin (0.719, 95% CI: = 0.652-0.787, P < 0.001), lymphocyte count (0.613, 95% CI: = 0.538-0.687, P = 0.003), and CRP (0.708, 95% CI: = 0.641-0.776, P < 0.001). These findings suggested that the CALLY index had the optimal prognostic discriminatory ability in this study setting and prompted us to thoroughly assess the prognostic ability of the CALLY index in OSCC.

 Figure 1 

ROC curve analysis of the CALLY index in patients with operated OSCC.

J Cancer Image

(View in new window)

 Table 2 

Comparison of the AUC values of CALLY index and its components

Nutrition and inflammatory markers
CALLY index0.740(0.676-0.806)<0.001-

aThe AUC values between the CALLY index and other markers were compared using the Z test.

Clinicopathological characteristics stratified by CALLY index cutoff

The study population was grouped into two cohorts in accordance with whether they had a CALLY index higher or lower than the cutoff of 0.65; the high- and low-CALLY-index groups comprised 198 (70.9%) and 81 (29.1%) patients, respectively. The distributions of clinicopathological and demographic characteristics in the low-CALLY-index (<0.65) and high-CALLY-index (≥0.65) cohorts are detailed in Table 3. Significant correlations were identified between low CALLY index and age ≥ 65 years (P = 0.031), stage III or IV disease (P = 0.002), cervical nodal metastasis (P = 0.003), T3 or T4 classification (P < 0.001), DOI ≥ 10 mm (P < 0.001), the presence of ENE (P < 0.001), the need for adjuvant therapy (P = 0.001), and shorter median survival time (P < 0.001). However, no significant between-cohort differences were noted terms of in sex (P = 0.763), PNI (P = 0.415), cancer cell differentiation (P = 0.401), surgical margin (P = 0.253), tumor subsites (P = 0.396), personal habits (P = 0.673), or CCI distribution (P = 0.091).

 Table 3 

Clinicopathological characteristics based on the cut-off of CALLY index

VariableCALLY index ≥ 0.65 (n = 198)CALLY index < 0.65 (n =81)P
Men176 (70.7%)73 (29.3%)
Women22 (73.3%)8 (26.7%)
Age 0.031a
< 65150 (74.6%)51 (25.4%)
≥ 6548 (61.5%)30 (38.5%)
AJCC stage 0.002a
I-II75 (83.3%)15 (16.7%)
III-IV123 (65.0%)66 (35.0%)
Tumor size (T classification)<0.001a
T1-T2100 (82.0%)22 (18.0%)
T3-T498 (62.4%)59 (37.6%)
Nodal metastasis (N classification)0.003a
N0138 (77.1%)41 (22.9%)
N1-N360 (60.0%)40 (40.0%)
Absent151 (72.2%)58 (27.8%)
Present47 (67.1%)23 (32.9%)
Absent170 (75.9%)54 (24.1%)
Present28 (50.9%)27 (49.1%)
Cancer cell differentiation0.401a
W-D/M-D178 (71.8%)70 (28.2%)
P-D20 (64.5%)11 (35.5%)
Surgical margin0.253a
≥ 5 mm150 (72.8%)56 (27.2%)
< 5 mm48 (65.8%)25 (34.2%)
DOI ≥ 10 mm<0.001a
No117 (80.1%)29 (19.9%)
Yes81 (60.9%)52 (39.1%)
Tumor sites0.396a
Tongue84 (74.3%)29 (25.7%)
Buccal mucosa61 (71.8%)24 (28.2%)
Other53 (65.4%)28 (34.6%)
Personal habits0.673a
No exposure24 (75.0%)8 (25.0%)
One exposure14 (77.8%)4 (22.2%)
Two or all exposure160 (69.9%)69 (30.1%)
Treatment 0.001a
Surgery only103 (76.9%)31 (23.1%)
Surgery + RT33 (84.6%)6 (15.4%)
Surgery + CRT62 (58.5%)44 (41.5%)
0111 (76.6%)34 (23.4%)
152 (63.4%)30 (36.6%)
≥ 235 (67.3%)17 (32.7%)
Laboratory results
Albumin(g/dL), median (IQR)4.55 (4.32-4.72)4.06 (3.59-4.41)<0.001b
WBC (X103/μL), median (IQR)7.45 (6.18-9.20)8.20 (6.55-10.85)0.055b
Neutrophil (X103/μL), median (IQR)4.54 (3.58-6.03)5.48 (3.70-7.60)0.007b
Lymphocyte (X103/μL), median (IQR)2.09 (1.66-2.65)1.87 (1.43-2.34)0.001b
CRP (mg/dL), median (IQR)1.85 (0.92-4.16)3.65 (1.88-7.18)<0.001b
Survival in months, median (IQR)50.00 (31.75-70.00)26.50 (10.75-66.50)<0.001b

athe Chi-square test. bthe Mann-Whitney U test.

Association between CALLY index and survival outcomes

The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test findings indicated that the estimated median OS was >99 months for the patients with a CALLY index of ≥0.65 and 32 (95% CI 16-46) months for those with a CALLY index of <0.65 (P < 0.001, Figure 2A). The associations of OS with clinicopathological variables are presented in Table 4. In the univariate analysis, poor OS was significantly associated with stage IV disease, PNI, P-D OSCC, surgical margin < 5 mm, need for adjuvant chemotherapy, CCI ≥ 2, and CALLY index < 0.65. Multivariate analysis revealed that for poor OS, the independent risk factors were stage IV disease (HR = 3.811, 95% CI: 1.476-9.839, P = 0.006), P-D OSCC (HR = 3.157, 95% CI: 1.686-5.912, P < 0.001), CCI ≥ 2 (HR = 1.431, 95% CI: 1.073-3.087, P = 0.033), and CALLY index < 0.65 (HR = 3.816, 95% CI: 2.393-6.086, P < 0.001). To further elucidate the effect of the CALLY index-cancer stage interaction on OS, we plotted survival curves stratified by CALLY index and cancer stage (Figure 3). Regardless of whether the OSCC was in an early or advanced stage, the low-CALLY-index group had a significantly shorter OS compared with the high-CALLY-index group (Figure 3A and 3C: stage I-II and stage III-IV, respectively; both P < 0.001).

The estimated median DFS was 86 months for the patients with a CALLY index of ≥ 0.65 and 23 (95% CI 15-31) months for those with a CALLY index of < 0.65 (p < 0.001, Figure 2B). The univariate analysis findings shown in Table 5 indicate significant associations of poor DFS with stage IV disease, P-D OSCC, need for adjuvant chemotherapy, and CALLY index < 0.65. Stage IV disease (HR = 2.443, 95% CI: 1.333-4.479, P = 0.004), P-D OSCC (HR = 2.560, 95% CI: 1.535-4.269, P < 0.001), and CALLY index < 0.65 (HR = 2.103, 95% CI: 1.451-3.049, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of poor DFS according to the multivariate analysis (Table 5). In addition, the survival curves stratified by CALLY index and cancer stage indicated that, relative to those in the high-CALLY-index group, the patients in the low-CALLY-index group with early (stage I-II, Figure 3B) and advanced (stage III-IV, Figure 3D) disease had significantly poorer DFS (P = 0.036 and < 0.001, respectively).

 Figure 2 

Kaplan-Meier curves displaying the estimated survival probabilities in patients with OSCC, with stratification according to the optimal cutoff value of the CALLY index. A. OS analysis. B. DFS analysis.

J Cancer Image

(View in new window)

 Figure 3 

Survival curves for stratification in accordance with the CALLY index cutoff and cancer stage. A. OS analysis in stage I-II OSCC. B. DFS analysis in stage I-II OSCC C. OS analysis in stage III-IV OSCC. D. DFS analysis in stage III-IV OSCC.

J Cancer Image

(View in new window)

Stratified analysis regarding discriminative ability of CALLY index

The results of the stratified analysis are illustrated in Figure 4. The CALLY index was consistently associated with OS when patients were grouped by different tumor subsite (buccal cancer: HR: 4.79, 95% CI: 2.28-10.05, P < 0.001; tongue cancer: HR: 4.03, 95% CI: 1.94-8.38, P < 0.001), tumor-node-metastasis stage (stage I or II: HR: 6.90, 95% CI: 2.18-21.82, P = 0.001; stage III or IV: HR: 3.58, 95% CI: 2.23-5.76, P < 0.001), T classification (T1 or T2: HR: 2.99, 95% CI: 1.29-6.96, P = 0.011; T3 or T4: HR: 4.40, 95% CI: 2.59-7.47, P < 0.001), nodal involvement (N0: HR: 5.33, 95% CI: 2.71-10.48, P < 0.001; N1-N3: HR: 3.21, 95% CI: 1.80-5.73, P < 0.001), ENE status (no ENE: HR: 4.09, 95% CI: 2.39-6.99, P < 0.001; with ENE: HR: 3.59, 95% CI: 1.64-7.89, P = 0.001), PNI status (no PNI: HR: 4.22, 95% CI: 2.44-7.30, P < 0.001; with PNI: HR: 5.48, 95% CI: 2.62-11.44, P < 0.001), need for adjuvant chemotherapy (no chemotherapy: HR: 5.15, 95% CI: 2.63-10.11, P < 0.001; with chemotherapy HR: 3.07, 95% CI: 1.72-5.46, P < 0.001), surgical margin (margin ≥ 5 mm: HR: 4.57, 95% CI: 2.64-7.91, P < 0.001; margin < 5 mm: HR: 4.16, 95% CI: 2.01-8.61, P < 0.001), and DOI status (DOI ≥ 10 mm: HR: 4.87, 95% CI: 2.65-8.95, P < 0.001; DOI < 10 mm: HR: 3.29, 95% CI: 1.68-6.46, P = 0.001).

Nomograms for OS prediction

To enhance the accuracy of individualized OS prediction in patients with OSCC, we created a prognostic nomogram on the basis of the independent prognostic factors identified in the multivariate analysis—overall stage, cancer cell differentiation, CCI, and CALLY index (Figure 5). For comparison, we also established a nomogram on the basis of AJCC stage alone. Figure 5A depicts the proposed nomogram for estimating the 3-year and 5-year OS; the corresponding AUC was 0.81 (sensitivity, 81.1%; specificity, 71.3%). The nomogram incorporating CALLY index and clinicopathological factors had a C-index (95% CI) of 0.797 (0.760-0.826); for the nomogram incorporating AJCC stage only, the C-index was 0.672 (0.641-0.703). Figure 5B and 5C presents the calibration plots of 3-year and 5-year OS probabilities, respectively, estimated using the proposed nomogram. The plots show high consistency with the 45° diagonal, which indicates good prediction. The nomogram model was thus concluded to have high calibration accuracy. All these results suggest the informative role of the CALLY index in OSCC and indicate that the nomogram incorporating the CALLY index has high performance in estimating the OS of patients with OSCC after surgery.

 Table 4 

Multivariate analysis of OS in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

VariableUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysis
SurvivalHR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)P
Men68.1%1.541 (0.709-3.351)0.2750.997 (0.443-2.243)0.995
Age (years)
< 6570.2%ReferenceReference
≥ 6565.7%1.261 (0.801-1.986)0.3161.037 (0.619-1.737)0.890
AJCC stage
II81.5%1.653 (0.555-4.919)0.3672.159 (0.712-6.544)0.174
III85.0%1.331 (0.446-3.972)0.6081.354 (0.449-4.085)0.590
IV52.7%5.157 (2.228-11.935)<0.0013.811 (1.476-9.839)0.006
Present52.9%2.178 (1.395-3.398)0.0011.443 (0.854-2.439)0.171
Cell differentiation
P-D39.7%3.396 (2.000-5.768)<0.0013.157 (1.686-5.912)<0.001
Surgical margin
≥ 5 mm72.9%ReferenceReference
< 5mm58.6%1.703 (1.091-2.658)0.0191.319 (0.806-2.159)0.271
Tumor sites
Buccal mucosa65.7%1.295 (0.774-2.168)0.325
Other68.8%1.188 (0.700-2.018)0.523
Personal habits
No exposure75.3%Reference
One exposure53.4%2.245 (0.814-6.193)0.118
Two or all exposure69.4%1.439 (0.661-3.134)0.359
Adjuvant chemotherapy
Yes52.1%2.907 (1.881-4.492)<0.0011.388 (0.724-2.162)0.570
166.4%1.457 (0.877-2.423)0.1461.228 (0.705-2.136)0.468
≥ 257.9%1.965 (1.157-3.335)0.0121.431 (1.073-3.087)0.033
CALLY index
≥ 0.6580.6%ReferenceReference
< 0.6542.2%4.544 (2.934-7.037)<0.0013.816 (2.393-6.086)<0.001
 Table 5 

Multivariate analysis of DFS in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

VariableUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysis
SurvivalHR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)P
Men49.8%1.613 (0.864-3.011)0.1331.180 (0.625-2.225)0.610
Age (years)
< 6551.5%ReferenceReference
≥ 6553.3%0.914 (0.622-1.343)0.6470.884 (0.594-1.318)0.546
AJCC stage
II66.7%0.937 (0.447-1.964)0.8641.072 (0.508-2.261)0.855
III65.9%1.002 (0.499-2.013)0.9941.114 (0.550-2.256)0.764
IV37.6%2.445 (1.452-4.118)0.0012.443 (1.333-4.479)0.004
Present43.1%1.355 (0.922-1.991)0.122
Cell differentiation
P-D30.5%2.383 (1.487-3.819)<0.0012.560 (1.535-4.269)<0.001
Surgical margin
≥ 5 mm54.8%Reference
< 5mm44.9%1.369 (0.947-1.978)0.095
Tumor sites
Buccal mucosa48.1%1.203 (0.789-1.834)0.390
Other48.2%1.349 (0.890-2.045)0.158
Personal habits
No exposure70.3%Reference
One exposure41.5%2.067 (0.859-4.972)0.105
Two or all exposure50.6%1.744 (0.911-3.338)0.093
Adjuvant chemotherapy
Yes41.1%1.761 (1.247-2.486)0.0011.369 (0.687-2.415)0.260
151.6%1.083 (0.724-1.621)0.698
≥250.2%1.127 (0.719-1.765)0.603
CALLY index
≥ 0.6559.3%ReferenceReference
< 0.6535.0%2.260 (1.594-3.203)<0.0012.103 (1.451-3.049)<0 0.001


Currently, the AJCC staging system integrating tumor extent, regional lymph node status, and distant metastasis status is the tool most frequently used in the OSCC context for optimizing treatments, predicting survival, and stratifying patient groups. A limitation of this system is that it accounts only for cancer characteristics; it neglects host factors that can affect oncologic outcomes, such as patients' nutrition and systemic inflammatory status [23]. Evidence is increasingly showing that cancer development is closely associated with the host's nutrition and the inflammatory response within the tumor microenvironment [24, 25] and that some of these nutrition and inflammation-related parameters—such as serum albumin and CRP levels and lymphocyte count—have the potential to predict OSCC prognosis [12-14]. Iida et al. proposed the CALLY index, which combines indicators of the host's nutrition (serum albumin level) and immune-inflammatory response (serum CRP level and lymphocyte count), and demonstrated its superior prognostic discrimination in patients with HCC after hepatectomy [17]. However, relevant information on the CALLY index in OSCC has been lacking, and whether this index yields prognostic discrimination superior to that of its components (albumin and CRP levels and lymphocyte count) is also uncertain for OSCC. Our review of the literature suggests that this study is the first to explore the prognostic value of the CALLY index in the context of OSCC treated with curative surgery. The ROC curve analysis revealed that the AUC of the CALLY index was higher than that of albumin level, CRP level, and lymphocyte count, suggesting that the CALLY index has better prognostic discrimination for OS than its component elements. In addition, significant associations of a low CALLY index (<0.65) with older age (≥65 years), adverse clinicopathological characteristics (e.g. stage III or IV disease, late pT classification, cervical nodal metastasis, DOI ≥ 10 mm, and presence of ENE), need for adjuvant therapy, and relatively short median survival were discovered, suggesting the importance of a survey for malnutrition and inflammatory status before the operation with regard to OSCC prognosis and disease aggressiveness. Patients with a preoperative CALLY index of <0.65 exhibited significantly shorter median OS and DFS than those with a CALLY index ≥ 0.65, as indicated by the log-rank and Kaplan-Meier results. Our multivariate Cox analyses revealed that a low CALLY index (<0.65) is an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality and treatment failure in OSCC, increasing the corresponding risks by factors of 3.816 and 2.103, respectively, when adjusting for various confounding factors. In addition, the CALLY index exhibited consistent prognostic performance for OS across different subgroups. Overall, our hypothesis was confirmed, suggesting that in patients with operated OSCC, the CALLY index before surgery could be a promising prognostic biomarker. Extending from these findings, patient who has a lower CALLY index before surgery may have poor survival outcome due to the unfavorable general condition for conventional curative treatment. A more careful and personalized therapeutic strategy, as well as follow-up in a shorter interval, may be necessary for these patients.

 Figure 4 

Stratified analysis regarding the discriminative ability of the CALLY index. HR > 1.0 indicated poorer survival.

J Cancer Image

(View in new window)

 Figure 5 

Prognostic nomogram established for prediction of 3-year and 5-year OS. A. Nomogram incorporating the CALLY index and clinicopathological factors. Each factor is connected to the uppermost point score by a vertical line, and the corresponding points represent how much this factor added to the risk. A total points score is obtained by summing the points from each factor and converted into 3-year and 5-year OS probabilities by drawing vertical lines to the respective axis below. B. Calibration plots of 3-year OS. C. Calibration plots of 5-year OS. Calibration plots indicate the consistency between nomogram-predicted survival and actual outcomes. Perfect survival prediction is indicated by the 45° light-gray line. The nomogram performance and 95% CIs for survival are indicated blue dots and bars, respectively.

J Cancer Image

(View in new window)

Although this study's results support a prognostic role of the CALLY index in OSCC, the precise mechanisms underlying the associations of low CALLY index with adverse clinical and survival outcomes in those with OSCC remain uncertain. Our results have revealed that a low CALLY index (<0.65) is associated with adverse pathological features and may be indicative of poor nutrition [26] and low antitumor immunity [27], increased systemic inflammatory response [28], or both, and these findings may provide insights into the prognostic mechanism of the CALLY index in OSCC. In clinical settings, serum albumin is frequently used as a marker to reflect a person's nutritional status [26], and malnutrition and cachexia are common and critical problems in patients with OSCC [29]. Serum albumin level was also demonstrated by Bao et al. in their prospective study to be inversely associated with OS among 1395 patients with OSCC [12]. Tsai et al. assessed the albumin level of 233 patients who had locally advanced head and neck cancer at two time points, before and after curative surgery, and demonstrated significant correlations of lower preoperative albumin level with adverse OS, DFS, and disease-specific survival [22]. Cancer-induced reprogramming of the host's glucose metabolism may cause insulin resistance and further decrease the serum albumin production [30]. In addition, tumor-cell-derived proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor alpha in turn reduce the hepatic synthesis of albumin [31]. This evidence suggests that cancer-associated malnutrition and cachexia may be accompanied by hypoalbuminemia, skeletal muscle wasting, low physical activity, and poor quality of life, which ultimately contribute to the poor survival outcomes in OSCC [12, 32, 33]. The peripheral lymphocyte count is another element of the CALLY index, and lymphocytes play an essential role in initiating and activating the adaptive immune response [34]. CD4+ T helper cells produce cytokines such as IL-2 and interferon gamma and promote activation and recruitment of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells [35], which exert antitumor effects and directly cause cancer cell destruction through the release of perforin and granzyme [36]. Given that the peripheral lymphocyte count reflects a person's cytotoxic immune function [37], the presence of more T helper and tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic T cells was found to correlate with better prognosis for solid tumors [38]. However, in the tumor environment, upregulated programmed death ligand-1 may constrain the antitumor response of cytotoxic T cells and reduce the proliferation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes [39, 40]. In addition, proapoptotic ligands such as Fas ligand and tumor necrosis factor-beta were reported to be produced in patients with cancer and promote the apoptosis of lymphocytes [41]. Therefore, lymphopenia was reported to be associated with increased chemotherapy toxicity and poor OS in many malignancies [42], including head and neck cancer [14]. Kreinbrink et al. assessed the pretreatment absolute lymphocyte count of 201 patients who underwent radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer and demonstrated that pretreatment lymphocyte count could independently predict survival [14]. Finally, serum CRP level is the denominator of the CALLY index; it is an acute-phase protein that increases following IL-6 secretion by T cells and macrophages and reflects the systemic inflammatory response [43]. The proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 is commonly upregulated in various types of cancer including OSCC [44], and the elevated IL-6 level may promote nodal and distant metastasis by activating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway and correlate with cancer proliferation and poor survival [45]. CRP elevation in response to IL-6 upregulation may be a mechanism linking high serum CRP level and poor prognosis. Regarding the tumor microenvironment, as the volume of a tumor increases, inadequate supply of blood to the tumor could result in central necrosis and inflammation of the tumor [46], and the direct extension and penetration of cancer cells could also lead to inflammation and tissue damage such as bone destruction [47]. Therefore, elevated CRP may not only be a response to progression of the tumor burden but also reflect tumor lysis and local tissue damage, which ultimately correlates with adverse survival outcomes [48]. The aforementioned studies have provided evidence of the mechanism through which a low CALLY index may have an adverse effect on prognosis in those with OSCC; nonetheless, the exact mechanism should be further explored.

The widely used AJCC staging system considers only tumor characteristics. However, patient factors such as antitumor immunity, systemic inflammation, and nutritional status are also significantly associated with the survival outcomes of OSCC [12, 13, 19], and not considering these factors when prognosticating may impair the accuracy of survival predictions. Given that CALLY index integrates the peripheral lymphocyte count with serum CRP and albumin levels in an easily calculable manner, we developed a prognostic nomogram incorporating the CALLY index, AJCC stage system, and clinicopathological features to provide individualized 3-year and 5-year OS estimations and favorable results were obtained (C-index: 0.797; AUC: 0.81). The calibration plots also indicated that the OS probabilities predicted using the proposed nomogram and the actual survival outcomes were in good consistency. All the aforementioned results verify the high performance of the proposed nomogram and suggest the informative role of the CALLY index in patients with OSCC, possibly aiding in personalized treatment planning and therefore affecting all aspects of cancer management; nevertheless, further research is warranted.

Notably, the method used to determine the cutoff value, different primary tumor sites and cancer stages, and a diverse age distribution in a study cohort may all affect the cutoff value of a prognostic indicator. In the current study setting, the most applicable cutoff value of the CALLY index was identified as 0.65 for OSCC prognostication, whereas Iida et al. selected an optimal cutoff value of 5 by using ROC curve analysis in patients with HCC [17]. By examining the laboratory data of patients enrolled in our study and Iida et al., we found that our OSCC cohort had a 3.6-fold higher median serum CRP level compared with that of patients with HCC reported by Iida et al. (0.36 vs. 0.10 mg/dL) [17], which can be partially explained by increased oral and systemic inflammation resulting from oral microbiota [49]. In addition, patients with OSCC are susceptible to malnutrition [50] and food intake dysfunction [51] and therefore have a decreased serum albumin level. All these factors may contribute to the lower cutoff value for the CALLY index in our study than the cutoff reported for the HCC cohort. Given that the optimal cutoff value of the CALLY index is likely to vary between different cancer sites, this aspect warrants further investigation.

Some of the strengths of this study are as follows: it is the first exploration of the prognostic role of the CALLY index in OSCC, the patient homogeneity in our relatively large cohort was high, and a prognostic nomogram was established that can be used to realize the clinical application of CALLY index and predict OS accurately. We also analyzed various clinicopathological factors and compared low- and high-CALLY-index groups to eliminate the effects of potential confounders. Because the CALLY index is inexpensive, convenient, and simple to calculate from the results of routine laboratory tests and has high prognostic accuracy, it is likely to have high utility in daily clinical practice. Future research on the CALLY index should explore its prognostic role in terms of whether it is affected by treatment modality and whether the benefits of a therapy can be assessed by evaluating its posttreatment versus pretreatment values. Some limitations of our study should be considered. First, it was conducted in a single center and retrospectively analyzed data in an institutional registry, which inevitably causes a certain bias. To reduce the potential bias, we enrolled a relatively large and homogenously treated OSCC cohort. Second, before an operation, the CALLY index may be influenced by subtle factors including indolent infection, undetected liver disease, and an aging-related physiological decrease in serum albumin level [52]. In addition, validation of our results with an independent dataset is necessary; external validation might strengthen the evidence supporting the prognostic value of the CALLY index in OSCC. All in all, our results should be validated through further large-scale, multi-institutional, prospective studies before the CALLY index can be recommended for general clinical use.


This is the first study to show that the preoperative CALLY index can be a promising prognostic biomarker in those who have undergone curative surgery for OSCC. The established nomogram integrating the CALLY index and clinicopathological factors yields accurate OS predictions that can aid individualized prognostication and treatment planning. Given the high cost-effectiveness and availability of the CALLY index, we believe it can be a feasible biomarker for OSCC management and cancer research.


AJCC: American Joint Committee on Cancer; AUC: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; C-index: concordance-index; CALLY index: C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte index; CCI: Charlson comorbidity index; CI: confidence interval; CRP: C-reactive protein; CRT: chemoradiotherapy; CT: computed tomography; DFS: disease-free survival; DOI: depth of invasion; ENE: extranodal extension; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; HR: hazard ratio; IL: interleukin; IQR: interquartile range; M-D: moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; OS: overall survival; OSCC: oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma; P-D: poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma; PNI: perineural invasion; ROC: receiver operating characteristic; WBC: white blood cell; W-D: well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma.


This work was supported by a grant (CMRPG6L0231) from Chiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. The authors thank the members of the HIE lab, Chiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, for their invaluable support.


KHF and YCL contributed to the conception and design of the work. GHC, MST, and CHL contributed to the acquisition of the data. CMH, EIH and HCC contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data. YTT and CAK drafted the manuscript. All authors have reviewed and approved this version of the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.


1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209-49

2. Kerawala C, Roques T, Jeannon JP, Bisase B. Oral cavity and lip cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines. J Laryngol Otol. 2016;130:S83-S9

3. Ko YC, Huang YL, Lee CH, Chen MJ, Lin LM, Tsai CC. Betel quid chewing, cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption related to oral cancer in Taiwan. J Oral Pathol Med. 1995;24:450-3

4. Omura K. Current status of oral cancer treatment strategies: surgical treatments for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol. 2014;19:423-30

5. Lin CY, Fan KH, Lee LY, Hsueh C, Yang LY, Ng SH. et al. Precision Adjuvant Therapy Based on Detailed Pathologic Risk Factors for Resected Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Long-Term Outcome Comparison of CGMH and NCCN Guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020;106:916-25

6. Lee LY, Lin CY, Cheng NM, Tsai CY, Hsueh C, Fan KH. et al. Poor tumor differentiation is an independent adverse prognostic variable in patients with locally advanced oral cavity cancer-Comparison with pathological risk factors according to the NCCN guidelines. Cancer Med. 2021;10:6627-41

7. Nair D, Mair M, Singhvi H, Mishra A, Nair S, Agrawal J. et al. Perineural invasion: Independent prognostic factor in oral cancer that warrants adjuvant treatment. Head Neck. 2018;40:1780-7

8. Lavaf A, Genden EM, Cesaretti JA, Packer S, Kao J. Adjuvant radiotherapy improves overall survival for patients with lymph node-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2008;112:535-43

9. de Almeida JR, Truong T, Khan NM, Su JS, Irish J, Gilbert R. et al. Treatment implications of postoperative chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity with minor and major extranodal extension. Oral Oncol. 2020;110:104845

10. Greten FR, Grivennikov SI. Inflammation and Cancer: Triggers, Mechanisms, and Consequences. Immunity. 2019;51:27-41

11. Zhang Q, Qian L, Liu T, Ding JS, Zhang X, Song MM. et al. Prevalence and Prognostic Value of Malnutrition Among Elderly Cancer Patients Using Three Scoring Systems. Front Nutr. 2021;8:738550

12. Bao X, Liu F, Lin J, Chen Q, Chen L, Chen F. et al. Nutritional assessment and prognosis of oral cancer patients: a large-scale prospective study. BMC Cancer. 2020;20:146

13. Khandavilli SD, Ceallaigh PO, Lloyd CJ, Whitaker R. Serum C-reactive protein as a prognostic indicator in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:912-4

14. Kreinbrink PJ, Li J, Parajuli S, Wise-Draper TM, Choi DL, Tang AL. et al. Pre-treatment absolute lymphocyte count predicts for improved survival in human papillomavirus (HPV)-driven oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2021;116:105245

15. Luan CW, Tsai YT, Yang HY, Chen KY, Chen PH, Chou HH. Pretreatment prognostic nutritional index as a prognostic marker in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11:17117

16. Fanali G, di Masi A, Trezza V, Marino M, Fasano M, Ascenzi P. Human serum albumin: from bench to bedside. Mol Aspects Med. 2012;33:209-90

17. Iida H, Tani M, Komeda K, Nomi T, Matsushima H, Tanaka S. et al. Superiority of CRP-albumin-lymphocyte index (CALLY index) as a non-invasive prognostic biomarker after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. HPB (Oxford). 2021;24:101-15

18. Charlson ME, Charlson RE, Peterson JC, Marinopoulos SS, Briggs WM, Hollenberg JP. The Charlson comorbidity index is adapted to predict costs of chronic disease in primary care patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:1234-40

19. Ko CA, Fang KH, Hsu CM, Lee YC, Chang GH, Huang EI. et al. The preoperative C-reactive protein-lymphocyte ratio and the prognosis of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2021;43:2740-54

20. Zhang Z, Kattan MW. Drawing Nomograms with R: applications to categorical outcome and survival data. Ann Transl Med. 2017;5:211

21. Shimizu S, Hiratsuka H, Koike K, Tsuchihashi K, Sonoda T, Ogi K. et al. Tumor-infiltrating CD8(+) T-cell density is an independent prognostic marker for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Med. 2019;8:80-93

22. Tsai MH, Chuang HC, Lin YT, Lu H, Chen WC, Fang FM. et al. Clinical impact of albumin in advanced head and neck cancer patients with free flap reconstruction-a retrospective study. PeerJ. 2018;6:e4490

23. Montero PH, Yu C, Palmer FL, Patel PD, Ganly I, Shah JP. et al. Nomograms for preoperative prediction of prognosis in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2014;120:214-21

24. Michels KB. The role of nutrition in cancer development and prevention. Int J Cancer. 2005;114:163-5

25. Taniguchi K, Karin M. NF-kappaB, inflammation, immunity and cancer: coming of age. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18:309-24

26. Keller U. Nutritional Laboratory Markers in Malnutrition. J Clin Med. 2019;8:775

27. Templeton AJ, McNamara MG, Seruga B, Vera-Badillo FE, Aneja P, Ocana A. et al. Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106:dju124

28. Yao Z, Zhang Y, Wu H. Regulation of C-reactive protein conformation in inflammation. Inflamm Res. 2019;68:815-23

29. Muller-Richter U, Betz C, Hartmann S, Brands RC. Nutrition management for head and neck cancer patients improves clinical outcome and survival. Nutr Res. 2017;48:1-8

30. Schwartsburd P. Cancer-Induced Reprogramming of Host Glucose Metabolism: "Vicious Cycle" Supporting Cancer Progression. Front Oncol. 2019;9:218

31. Moldawer LL, Copeland EM 3rd. Proinflammatory cytokines, nutritional support, and the cachexia syndrome: interactions and therapeutic options. Cancer. 1997;79:1828-39

32. Lim WS, Roh JL, Kim SB, Choi SH, Nam SY, Kim SY. Pretreatment albumin level predicts survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2017;127:E437-E42

33. Yoshimura T, Suzuki H, Takayama H, Higashi S, Hirano Y, Tezuka M. et al. Prognostic Role of Preoperative Sarcopenia Evaluation of Cervical Muscles with Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:4725

34. Bonilla FA, Oettgen HC. Adaptive immunity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125:S33-40

35. Gajewski TF, Schreiber H, Fu YX. Innate and adaptive immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Nat Immunol. 2013;14:1014-22

36. Gonzalez H, Hagerling C, Werb Z. Roles of the immune system in cancer: from tumor initiation to metastatic progression. Genes Dev. 2018;32:1267-84

37. Karimi S, Chattopadhyay S, Chakraborty NG. Manipulation of regulatory T cells and antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte-based tumour immunotherapy. Immunology. 2015;144:186-96

38. Pages F, Galon J, Dieu-Nosjean MC, Tartour E, Sautes-Fridman C, Fridman WH. Immune infiltration in human tumors: a prognostic factor that should not be ignored. Oncogene. 2010;29:1093-102

39. Lin YM, Sung WW, Hsieh MJ, Tsai SC, Lai HW, Yang SM. et al. High PD-L1 Expression Correlates with Metastasis and Poor Prognosis in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0142656

40. Waldman AD, Fritz JM, Lenardo MJ. A guide to cancer immunotherapy: from T cell basic science to clinical practice. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20:651-68

41. Kim R, Emi M, Tanabe K, Uchida Y, Toge T. The role of Fas ligand and transforming growth factor beta in tumor progression: molecular mechanisms of immune privilege via Fas-mediated apoptosis and potential targets for cancer therapy. Cancer. 2004;100:2281-91

42. Menetrier-Caux C, Ray-Coquard I, Blay JY, Caux C. Lymphopenia in Cancer Patients and its Effects on Response to Immunotherapy: an opportunity for combination with Cytokines?. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7:85

43. Jones SA, Novick D, Horiuchi S, Yamamoto N, Szalai AJ, Fuller GM. C-reactive protein: a physiological activator of interleukin 6 receptor shedding. J Exp Med. 1999;189:599-604

44. Chen Z, Malhotra PS, Thomas GR, Ondrey FG, Duffey DC, Smith CW. et al. Expression of proinflammatory and proangiogenic cytokines in patients with head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 1999;5:1369-79

45. Choudhary MM, France TJ, Teknos TN, Kumar P. Interleukin-6 role in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma progression. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;2:90-7

46. Acharya S, Kale J, Hallikeri K, Anehosur V, Arnold D. Clinical significance of preoperative serum C-reactive protein in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;47:16-23

47. Huang SF, Wei FC, Liao CT, Wang HM, Lin CY, Lo S. et al. Risk stratification in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma by preoperative CRP and SCC antigen levels. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:3856-64

48. Chen HH, Chen IH, Liao CT, Wei FC, Lee LY, Huang SF. Preoperative circulating C-reactive protein levels predict pathological aggressiveness in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective clinical study. Clin Otolaryngol. 2011;36:147-53

49. Zhang L, Liu Y, Zheng HJ, Zhang CP. The Oral Microbiota May Have Influence on Oral Cancer. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:476

50. Yoshimura T, Suzuki H, Takayama H, Higashi S, Hirano Y, Tezuka M. et al. Impact of Preoperative Low Prognostic Nutritional Index and High Intramuscular Adipose Tissue Content on Outcomes of Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12:3167

51. Tsai YT, Chen WC, Hsu CM, Tsai MS, Chang GH, Lee YC. et al. Survival-Weighted Health Profiles in Patients Treated for Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2021;11:754412

52. Greenblatt DJ. Reduced serum albumin concentration in the elderly: a report from the Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1979;27:20-2

Author contact

Corresponding address Corresponding author: Ku-Hao Fang; Tel: +886-3281200 ext. 3967; E-mail: trance881057com; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan. No. 5 Fu-Hsing street, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Received 2022-5-10
Accepted 2022-7-17
Published 2022-7-27