J Cancer 2020; 11(19):5812-5821. doi:10.7150/jca.46927 This issue

Research Paper

Differences in tumour characteristics of Hepatocellular Carcinoma between patients with and without Cirrhosis: A population-based study

Bing Yan1,2*, Dou-Sheng Bai1*, Jian-Jun Qian1, Chi Zhang1, Sheng-Jie Jin1, Xuehao Wang3✉, Guo-Qing Jiang1✉

1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225001, China.
2. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Clinical College, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, China.
3. Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health; Department of Liver Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
*These authors contributed equally to this work.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
Yan B, Bai DS, Qian JJ, Zhang C, Jin SJ, Wang X, Jiang GQ. Differences in tumour characteristics of Hepatocellular Carcinoma between patients with and without Cirrhosis: A population-based study. J Cancer 2020; 11(19):5812-5821. doi:10.7150/jca.46927. Available from https://www.jcancer.org/v11p5812.htm

File import instruction


Background: Liver cirrhosis is a major risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, 10%-20% of patients with HCC do not have cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to explore the potential differences in tumour characteristics of HCC between patients with and without cirrhosis.

Methods: In this study, we identified total 10,849 patients with HCC diagnosed between 2010 and 2016, from the SEER database. The degree of fibrosis was categorized as “no cirrhosis” (Ishak score 0-4) or “cirrhosis” (Ishak score 5-6). Among all patients with HCC, patients with no cirrhosis and with cirrhosis accounted for 1800 (16.6%) and 9049 (83.4%), respectively.

Results: Significant negative correlations were observed between no cirrhosis/cirrhosis and pathological grade (r =-0.074, P <0.001), tumour size (r =-0.186, P <0.001), N stage (r =-0.024, P =0.025), M stage (r =-0.036, P <0.001), liver metastasis (r =-0.024, P =0.014), and lung metastasis (r =-0.027, P =0.006). Logistic multivariate regression analysis showed that, compared with cirrhosis, no cirrhosis is an independent risk predictor of pathological grade [odds ratio (OR), 0.685; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.571-0.822; P < 0.001], tumour size (OR, 0.392; 95% CI, 0.351-0.437; P < 0.001), N stage (OR, 0.704; 95% CI, 0.561-0.883; P < 0.001), and M stage (OR, 0.671; 95% CI, 0.561-0.804; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Compared with cirrhosis, no cirrhosis is significantly associated with worse pathological grade, larger tumour size, and more lymph node and distant metastases. Patients without cirrhosis that are otherwise neglected in HCC clinical practice require intensive focus in future studies.

Keywords: Cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, metastasis, pathological grade, tumour size