Full Text | PDF

J Cancer 2020; 11(23):6916-6924. doi:10.7150/jca.46805 This issue Cite

Research Paper

Early response and pathological complete remission in Breast Cancer with different molecular subtypes: a retrospective single center analysis

Jin Hong, Jiayi Wu, Ou Huang, Jianrong He, Li Zhu, Weiguo Chen, Yafen Li, Xiaosong Chen^✉#, Kunwei Shen^✉#

Department of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, PR China.
#Co-corresponding authors with equal contributions to this work.

✉ Corresponding authors: Kunwei Shen, Telephone number: +86-21-64370045-602208; E-mail address: kwshencom.cn, Complete address: Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No.197 Ruijin Second Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, 200025, PR China; and, Xiaosong Chen, Telephone number: +86-21-64370045-602102; E-mail address: chenxiaosong0156com, Complete address: Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No.197 Ruijin Second Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, 200025, PR China. More

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the association of clinical early response and pathological complete remission (pCR) in breast cancer patients with different molecular subtypes.

Materials and methods: Breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) with clinical early response assessment from October 2008 to October 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical early response was defined as tumor size decreasing ≥30% evaluated by ultrasound after two cycles of NAT. Chi-square test was used to compare the pCR rates between the responder and non-responder groups with different molecular subtypes. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent factors associated with the pCR.

Results: A total of 328 patients were included: 100 responders and 228 non-responders. The progesterone receptor (PR) expression was an independent factor associated with clinical early response (OR=2.39, 95%CI=1.41-4.05, P=0.001). The pCR rate of breast was 50.0% for responders and 18.0% for non-responders (P<0.001). Regarding different molecular subtypes, responders had higher pCR rates than non-responders for patients with HER2 overexpression (OR=10.66, 95%CI=2.18-52.15, P=0.001), triple negative (OR=3.29, 95%CI=1.23-8.84, P=0.016) and Luminal (HER2-) subtypes (OR=8.58, 95%CI=3.05-24.10, P<0.001) respectively. Moreover, pCR rate can be achieved as high as 88.2% in HER2 overexpression patients with early clinical response, which was significantly higher than patients without early response (41.3%, P=0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that clinical early response was an independent factor associated with the pCR rate (OR=4.87, 95%CI=2.72-8.72, P<0.001).

Conclusions: Early response was significantly associated with a higher pCR rate in breast cancer patients receiving NAT, especially for patients with HER2 overexpression subtype, which warrants further clinical evaluation.

Keywords: Breast cancer, clinical early response, pathological complete response, neoadjuvant treatment

Citation styles

©2024 Ivyspring International Publisher. Terms of use